Related Posts
Seems accurate 😊
Additional Posts in Litigation & Arbitration
New to Fishbowl?
Download the Fishbowl app to
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Seems accurate 😊
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Download the Fishbowl app to unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Copy and paste embed code on your site
Send download link to your phone
OR
Scan your QR code to download
Fishbowl app on your mobile
Meet and confer…
Senior Counsel 1 - Have you actually tried arguing that the new statute is silent as to what to do when a document is responsive to multiple requests? I feel like a reasonable interpretation would be to require you to state each request the document is responsive to, instead of interpreting it as not knowing what to do if your document is responsive to more than one request.
Make an index on a separate sheet, one column with the RFP numbers and the second with the responsive pages. I don’t think there’s a way to make it not be a pain. This is the best way I’ve figured out to do it so far....Interested in other ideas!!
Yeah, that’s the method I use for smaller productions. Curious to see if anyone has figured out a less labor-intensive method for larger productions.
Largely depends on how I requested docs from client.... if so, I’ll compile the docs pursuant to my first request to client as exhibit a and so on and so forth. If I have any doubt that exhibit C can be responsive to the disc request I’ll just refer to exhibit a and c .