Related Posts
Additional Posts in Politics
Definitely not suspicious at all. Nope.
New to Fishbowl?
Download the Fishbowl app to
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Definitely not suspicious at all. Nope.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Download the Fishbowl app to unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Copy and paste embed code on your site
Send download link to your phone
OR
Scan your QR code to download
Fishbowl app on your mobile
Are they charging protesters with sedition? Or the rioters?
Enthusiast
Rioters
Enthusiast
You missed the "violent" part purposefully I know. Charging violent protesters and looters is law and order in a civilized society.
Chief
You do know what sedition is, no?
Did they repeatedly attempt to burn it down?
Storming a government building with guns is a pretty clear message, if a foreign entity did the same it would be called Terrorism.
Do the armed men who stormed the state capital building over masks also get charged or no?
What kind of protestors though?
Oh SVP.
Thank you for your service.
Pro
How is it that the Left this whole time insists on drawing a distinction between "peaceful protesters" and "rioters", who surely don't represent the movement, but now when the RIOTERS are facing the consequences of their actions, now they're just "protesters" again?
Visual Storyteller
EY2; you clearly didn’t pay attention in history class to say something so flagrantly wrong when it comes to violence.
No one is trying to overthrow the government but get it straight that violence has been and will continue to be used when the people in power fail to listen to other means of communication.
Conversation Starter
Neglected the fact that they are RIOTERS? SVP, hopefully you enjoy the conservative majority court.
Chief
Sedition. Not looting. Not property damage.
Sedition