If going in house early, make sure you have midsize legal dept with several attorneys at different experience levels. Helps with mentoring and steering you in the right direction.
Pros: you’re in-house and that first in-house job is usually the hardest to get.
Cons: in my experience, legal training tends to be better at a law firm. So, going in-house early on might stunt your growth a bit. Also, my compensation went down drastically when I went in-house. Having 5 years of big law pay was super helpful and gave me the cushion I needed to be able to make the move in-house.
Pro
Only real pro I can see is getting out of biglaw (if you’re that miserable there) and getting a better overall WLB.
If going in house early, make sure you have midsize legal dept with several attorneys at different experience levels. Helps with mentoring and steering you in the right direction.
For me I went back being poor but having a good work life balance isn’t worth it. I made in the 100’s in house vs the 400’s plus in a firm.
Pros: you’re in-house and that first in-house job is usually the hardest to get.
Cons: in my experience, legal training tends to be better at a law firm. So, going in-house early on might stunt your growth a bit. Also, my compensation went down drastically when I went in-house. Having 5 years of big law pay was super helpful and gave me the cushion I needed to be able to make the move in-house.
Pros: Better work life balance. Cons: Lower salary. I went in-house to a large company from BigLaw after 3 years as an associate and I’m much happier.