More Posts
Jummah Mubarak Fam ☪️💚
Additional Posts in Sales
New to Fishbowl?
Download the Fishbowl app to
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Jummah Mubarak Fam ☪️💚
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Download the Fishbowl app to unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Copy and paste embed code on your site
No way...I can't believe they'd consider this. Feels like tech is slowly starting to lose its edge?
Pro
Yikes
Rising Star
If that's true, Google appear to believe that they're the market leader (they're not) and don't need to pay for performance. It also appears that they believe that they've overpaid individual contributors who are merely fortunate to be in their presence.
Here is the link is someone has a subscription. https://www.theinformation.com/articles/google-cloud-considers-scrapping-sales-commissions-based-on-deal-values
I know we have been focusing on revenue vs booking for almost 6 months now in my area. I think they don't see the value in having run rate or slightly above deals that eat up time and don't produce any real uplift. That said, it will be interesting how they incentives sales reps that won't have a direct line of sight to making their numbers
Misconception. It’s being evaluated to match closer to AWS & Azure. We have two “buckets” that contribute to a quota, without getting in to details like G1 said, people were getting paid out on commits (see partnerships with Epic, Jack Henry, CME etc). So it’s pivoting away from that and being paid out on run rate & consumption.
Yes
If it’s related to the pay, sounds similar to what this article refers to: https://www.forbes.com/sites/jackkelly/2022/11/21/alphabet-seeks-to-cut-10000-poor-performing-googlers/