My company covers in depth results each week, including meetings set/attended, wins, revenue, retention etc. I feel as if evaluating in such depth is detrimental to the psyche, as you never get to “ride the high.” In addition, some weeks are simply slower than others, and it’s not always representative of what the results at the end of the period or quarter will be. Is this not a big deal, and I’m I placing too much importance on it? Or is it beneficial to review results less frequently?
Chief
They don't (outside of the purchasing data). But for every one person that actually pays in time, there are many others who don't and owe 20%+ in interest.
Conversation Starter
ahh purchasing data... I never thought about this.. I wonder how lucrative this option is lol
@MCK1 https://open.spotify.com/episode/2Y6Q92b632IjgNPdskQLtG?si=I5znYGAuSiG1yPcfpWJyKg listen to this if interested. Breaks down the biz model albeit a bit detailed
They also likely charge a fee to the Merchant that contracts their payment services.
That’s why different retailers you make purchases from use different services.
Conversation Starter
Any idea on the type of fee structure, I’m curious
TLDR; One way is charging merchants for routing traffic to them, increasing avg basket size, and increasing rate of sale for items added to cart