How easy is it to settle a case when working at a plaintiff’s firm? (Please excuse my lack of knowledge here.) I read about how much people hate litigation/are trying to get out and then I have friends who talk about how they want to go to the plaintiff’s side because you can make a percentage of your settlements AND there are no billable requirements. I’m in the former boat of trying to leave litigation altogether to go into corporate law. Is it all just “the grass is greener” talk?
Chief
It’s very very easy to settle a case. It’s much harder to get a good settlement.
Chief
Half the battle is advising the client that a settlement is a good settlement. I’ve worked with countless people who are terrified advising someone to settle.
I’m in corporate M&A currently and I hate it. Not sure how much that helps but whether grass is greener will depend on what you like and don’t like and what life you want
Really depends on the type of case and it’s value. You can settle a rear ender with 10k in medical bills in a phone call or two (unless dealing with a substandard insurer). If you have a six or seven figure damages case not so much. This is all going to be firm dependent (what kind of cases you have). Also some firms don’t give associates a cut of each settlement. Instead that only happens with a file you bring in yourself. This is from a guy who used to litigate and do presuit PI cases but left because he was overworked and substantially underpaid.
What are the cons of going into the plaintiff’s side then? Thank you all for your input!
Cons: 1- you have to do a lot of babysitting and handholding for your clients. Plaintiff side is very customer service oriented. 2- while no billable requirements, many firms have an expectation as to how much you can get settled or jury awarded per year.
Why do you feel like these are your only choices? There are so many different practice areas out there