Related Posts
Any wagers # of layoffs at end of FY?
Avoiding the question about layoffs. Good job Miles.
Additional Posts
But once again not posting
Post for push testing
New to Fishbowl?
Download the Fishbowl app to
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
As long as we can fire the Georgian Secretary of State straight after.
Principal 1 why shouldn’t her makeup be focused on, as one of many things. We place the burden of expectation on her to be wearing it so obviously it’s important. Also she has bright rich skin tone and features which is uncommon for a politician so it is significant, her makeup, conscious awareness of her audience in image-based culture, how her image is being received. The face/makeup is another form of media and we can find valuable insight in thinking about what the makeup artist was trying to convey, to whom, and why
This has to be a joke lol. People aren’t art pieces to be analyzed over. The color palette of one’s skin tone isn’t a media form.
Now imagine talking about a male candidate the way Lazard just did about a woman. Yeesh.
Good job OP focusing on her make up than on her policy positions. Was "How Melania looks" a factor in voting for Trump.
Well...in all fairness AD did say "it ain't the most important point". AD: can you provide a link to this I haven't seen.
She can’t manage her own finances with mountains of debt, let alone her makeup. Not a positive sign of competence. Anyway, Her policy positions are weak and so lousy makeup is a diversion tactics for viewers
Not true. That is the new spin story. The earlier reports discuss details of her personal spending. Even if she did it to help her family does, so it is wise and a public office virtue to indebt oneself in order to “bail out family”? that mean she is likely to overspend and bail out anyone she considers “family”- sure sounds like it from her “blue wave "definition . The hallmarks of socialism. #VoteNo for Abrams
VP1, do a bit of digging into her personal situation before the snide commentary. A lot of her $$ has gone into helping her family.
When “generosity of spirit and charity” is used as an excuse to bail out others or a cover to buy their votes or an exemption from choosing not to exercise fiscal discipline, that is not charity but economic enslavement . “A government big enough to give you everything is big enough to take it away”-Ronald Reagan
I’m hoping Lazard was being sarcastic. Or...
Turns out generosity of spirit and charity is socialism. I guess only rich people are allowed that now?
Cute saying. It’s only Republicans that want to take aid away from the needy. Of course, Reagan did end up raising taxes too...