null
Related Posts
Additional Posts
I think you’re on mute?
How do you meet your fitness goals?
Any one from McKinsey?
New to Fishbowl?
Download the Fishbowl app to
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
I think you’re on mute?
How do you meet your fitness goals?
Any one from McKinsey?
Send download link to your phone
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Download the Fishbowl app to unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Copy and paste embed code on your site
You should ask. My take is that it seems that they want you to hire a diverse team like men, different races, etc. You seem to have a pretty homogeneous team.
Are you having conversations with HR about getting these candidates in the interview pool.
You also have to ask yourself? Are you turning off these candidates with your management style? Do other managers have diverse (in other ways) candidates? Is there back chatter that says you aren't favorable to diverse (in other ways) employees? If you have 70% women, that would be considered diverse in many tech companies, so they are trying to tell you something in a round about way. Ask probing questions to figure out what they are saying.
Don't get down though it may also just mean that they want you to have men and that makes them comfortable.
Diversity: Race, sex, socioeconomic status, disability etc.
In the context of corporate America - Black, Hispanics, and Indigenous populations are the populations that lack representation in tech and leadership roles. I am Hispanic and my entire org is 90% Asian with a few Blacks at lower levels - while that may scream “diversity” for some - the issue itself still remains. I would not consider my team diverse because they’ve sprinkled a few people in to meet a PR quota.
However being that this “diversity goal” stems from years of systematic issues it’s not that easy to find talent that is needed for the job. It takes time to level the playing field. As well as inclusion being the focus not just diversity 🤦🏻♀️ People do not want a ‘seat at the table’ when the still have to fight to be heard and accepted.
Fun fact: Woman are 100% of the time being asked to lead diversity efforts in addition to their current roles. Hate it 🙃
Black and Hispanic people
...where are you looking...
I think they have the wrong focus. HR should work with hiring managers to ensure you have a diverse pool of candidates then hire to most qualified. This will help increase diversity and have an awesome team. It also means taking away pointless parameters like having an MBA or xyz vanity qualifications that aren’t necessary or could easily be learned.
Bingo 🎯
MEN
I think people need to understand that diversity also brings in different approaches to problems in the workplace. So why not try to have a team inclusive of yes men as well?
Going from all men to all women is not exactly the goal of inclusion/diversity drives - is it?
Hire more men. Should be 50/50 to optimize diversity
Agreed!
You have to hire more ivy league white men.
Serious thought. You're a leader of people, and can't answer this question yourself? Perhaps that's what's stopping the promotion.
At your level I suspect you should know 1) what it means to build a diverse team and why diversity matters in business beyond a tick box or a 'diversity team ranking' exercise within the org. And if you don't know that then 2) know that you need to clarify expectations with your manager (not be told on a forum by strangers).
Pro
So is it true you guys have trouble hiring diverse talent because Google comp is “not competitive enough”?
You should ask them to clarify diverse by what measure? Gender? Race? Politically? Sexual orientation wise? What if you for example hire more gay men but then it skews the team politically? It feels like an impossibly vague standard that's set up for you to fail, so basically you should get it clarified in writing what the objective standard is so that you can actually hope to meet it some day.
Fair enough, the writing portion might be difficult, but at the very least take your own notes. Sometimes what I'll do is summarize a conversation and email the person, e.g. "thank you for setting aside the time to talk about my review today, I really appreciate you clarifying the requirements around diversity, particularly the suggestion to hire more POC..", etc.
Hope your boss can shed some light on this. Definitely curious to hear what comes out of it!
They are probably looking for you to hire from underrepresented groups in the US that’s Black, Latin X and Native American.
Don't call them "Latin X" though, that's a mildly offensive term mostly used by white chauvinists who think they can "fix" other peoples' native language.
Pretty sure hiring based on sex, race, or any other protected class is highly illegal.
@SE2, do you know anything about MLK, or are you being that comment on one line from one speech?
Hire more white men lol
Isn't the whole Diversity Hire thing a slippery slope though?
"Diversity" is not a well defined goal. Since there are so many different ways to classify people such as skin-color, sex, sexual-orientation, country-of-origin, and socio-economic status etc to name a few; the permutations just explode very quickly. With a finite team size, how can you ever be objectively "Diverse"?
No one knows the answer, obviously. The decision therefore is generally just left to be a subjective one in the hands of someone, most likely with their own biases one way or the other.
Doesn't sound like a good way to run anything IMHO.
Just to be clear, I'm not a white guy, so keep your "white male defence" comments to yourselves. I have suffered prejudice all my life and continue to do so. But adjudication of "diversity" does more harm than good in my experience.
SAP1, the last scenario that you mentioned is the very thing I was alluding to when I said that adjudication of diversity does more harm than good. Protecting bad employees while at the same time laying off some decently good ones will only lead to remorse, wouldn't it? What are we trying to do - dilute racism and racial injustice or turn it into a more subtle form of itself?
If anything, we should definitely give more OPPORTUNITY to minorities, myself included, but from there on we should let MERIT be the judge. Artificiality trying to maintain a diversity goal is a step in the wrong direction IMO. This is something that will ensure the rise of the right minded people from the minorities.
LOL, this is hilarious. The 'diversity' BS strikes again. It will slowly but steadily drag any team/company down until it can no longer function. Good luck.
Just be honest and admit that you only want to work with people that look, talk, and have the same experiences as you 😂
Hello all - went and had a chat with the head of my group. He mentioned that I needed to recruit more engineers from underrepresented racial backgrounds. He praised me for my team’s existing diversity and mentioned my team is in a prime spot to recruit more diverse talent - more than other teams, hence the feedback I got.
He acknowledged the pipeline issue I mentioned, but told me it’s my responsibility to get involved in earlier part of the process (ie sourcing at events, HBCU, etc) and push for their candidacy with the hiring committee.
It was fair feedback and there are some concrete next steps, anyone here know of any android engineers from underrepresented racial backgrounds please let me know!
You should also know that NSBE (National Society of Black Engineers), the BDPA ( Black Data Processing Associates), and SHPE (Society Hidpanic Professional Engineers) have outreach into most large companies. You should check in your company and with them.
I also think it is unfair of any boss to say you need to figure out how to recruit at an HBCU. Recruiting at a college are full time jobs or departments at most big businesses. I think the right comment is you need to connect with the person or department that does this type of recruiting.
Know what else promotes diversity and encourages diverse candidates? When they see diversity in leadership, not just at the lower levels. SO, they should promote YOU if they actually care about diversity instead of this attempt to hire for the sake of diversity alone.
It looks like you discriminate against men. There should be no reason if you look on the qualification itself only to be 70% of women on the team.
Also promotion driven hiring is adorable. Big tech at it’s best.
Ask yourself what other minorities exist in the world
How about you just hire the best person for for job regardless of any other identifying characteristic? We've been telling people to stop being racists, sexists, and homophobes for decades, but now we tell them it's ok to discriminate as long as it's in favor of the right groups. I hope that one day humanity sees all of this DEI stuff for the hypocrisy it is.
Because hiring based on merits IS “racist” these days.
I’d ask for what diversity they mean specifically in writing
How did you manage to hire 70% women?
Hire me a brown guy 😂 middle eastern story of my life :)