Yes, it absolutely is and depends entirely on the judge. That is a typical qualification but it is by no means some sort of mandated minimum across the entire judiciary.
Yes. Absolutely. I did moot bc LR did not attract me at all. I also did a fed externship and worked at a firm. All those type of writing and research experiences are relevant. My judge hired me without LR. So if u have a good judge, LR wont be the ultimate defining factor. However, if you have a judge that only cares about LR, then they may not divert from that req.
Absolutely. I did a fed clerkship and wasn't even on law review period nor was I on the Ed board of my secondary journal. Definitely not a requirement and absolutely judge specific/dependent.
Yes you can, but it depends on the judge’s preferences. Look for other ways to highlight your writing and editing skills (ie the type of skills they think you’re developing in law review) that you’ve developed.
Chief
Yes, it absolutely is and depends entirely on the judge. That is a typical qualification but it is by no means some sort of mandated minimum across the entire judiciary.
Yes. Absolutely. I did moot bc LR did not attract me at all. I also did a fed externship and worked at a firm. All those type of writing and research experiences are relevant. My judge hired me without LR. So if u have a good judge, LR wont be the ultimate defining factor. However, if you have a judge that only cares about LR, then they may not divert from that req.
Absolutely. I did a fed clerkship and wasn't even on law review period nor was I on the Ed board of my secondary journal. Definitely not a requirement and absolutely judge specific/dependent.
Yes you can, but it depends on the judge’s preferences. Look for other ways to highlight your writing and editing skills (ie the type of skills they think you’re developing in law review) that you’ve developed.
Thank you both!