Related Posts
I need a genuine suggestion please, I have a 3 months of Work experience post my Post graduation which I don’t need to showcase and accordingly I didn’t include it in the resume, I have an offer from Wipro now , will it create an issue if I give it during BGV or I can avoid declaring the details in BGV, please suggest
Wipro Infosys
Additional Posts in Technology/IT Consultants
I am a Principal Solutions Architect with 13 YOE of which 5 years exp is with Biotech focusing on Public Cloud (AWS) & overall AWS exp. 9 years. I need suggestions /opinions if applying for a Senior Solutions Architect (Level6) at AWS makes sense or if I should aim for a Principal SA (level 7) role at AWS with Healthcare & Lifesciences industry experience. If it makes any difference, I worked for AWS ProServe as an external SA in the past. Any insights / feedback appreciated.
Amazon Web Services
Anyone here “overemployed”?
New to Fishbowl?
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
AWS, I work in the space and they are far more mature. First mover advantage, more mature, you name it. That’s not to discredit GCP, but they have work to do. For start up/small company purposes, you can’t do better than AWS. Hope this helps, OP
Personal opinion is AWS. If it was "my" company.
But they all have their use cases:
- GCP for machine learning, and some of their advanced networking
- Azure for anything .NET framework, and the Microsoft ecosystem (Visual Studio, VSTS, TFS, Active Directory, o365, bundled pricing, etc)
- AWS for literally everything else.
AWS has the number of services, regions, 3rd party integrations, 1st and 3rd party documentation and tutorials, to scratch any itch. In my opinion, talent and experience are also easier to find probably due to time on market and overall market share (of native public cloud, not XaaS like o365 being thrown in).
Unless you are one of the specific use cases above, you tend to need a reason NOT to use AWS.
- my 2 cents
D1 is actually Google Fanboy 1
The cloud strategy should not be dedicated to one vendor. They each have different options, capabilities, and pricing models... essentially pros and cons depending on the solution you need. Focus on your requirements to see which vendor is a better fit.
Azure for me.
Azure
Azure > AWS > GCP... anything else you are shooting yourself in the foot.
Azure
OCS lol
PwC1 attending Google NEXT and I will say I am pretty impressed with some of their out of the box ML capabilities. So that’s why I was curious
I know French fries come with most lunch meals but if I have a choice I’m going jalapeño poppers or cheese sticks all the way...🤷🏻♂️
Aws all the way. Especially with their new GRAPH DB
Azure. The contractual terms for AWS are less favorable. Also not interested in helping Amazon grow their empire any larger than it already is.
Oracle is for dinosaurs
Oracle Cloud is a joke
Anything but Azure - Microsoft EA is egregious. GCP is generally cheaper than AWS, leading ML / AI capabilities and more innovative. AWS has broadest offering and feels more like traditional enterprise IT offering. If it were me, I’d start with GCP and look to AWS when GCP did not have what I need.
@Accenture 1 - yes and perhaps, sorry
GCP also has in multiple instances locked companies out of production workloads due to false or exaggerated security claims and cost them big $$$.
Not in cloud space. What's Gcp
@A2 - GoogleCloud