Hi ,HR from JP is asking to hold 2 days for offer that they wl expedite process and release. However I have somehow trying to extend my joining date at HCL for 3 working day. Should I trust and wait to join JP . Also will HCL extend 3 days on my request on medical reasons . HR discussion at JP is pending
If i am on bench in nagarro and looking for opportunities outside, will I get immediate release or do i still need to serve my notice period partially / completely ?
As a leader in cyber, one of my aspirations is to increase the diversity of any organization that I am a part of.
For example…When I was in Big4, I referred several diverse candidates who are thriving & now, at McKinsey & Company, I set a personal goal to refer 1 diverse candidate, especially in (but not necessarily exclusive to) cyber/tech/IT, for every month of my tenure.
Continued in comments…
Who has quit their corporate job to do something completely different with the goal to just be happier? How did it work? Any advice?
Hi y’all! I’m a financial educator and my job is to help families in need of financial education! I help anyone on learning how money works here in the US & how to get rid of debt! I offer financial products that help you protect and grow your money. I’d love to help you out in reaching your personal financial needs!
I’m also always looking for people to hire!
So how many of you actually utilize the networking feature on here? Does anyone actually chat with others on here? Lol
Do associates/a.c. get exposure to C-Suite interaction in the life sciences side of consulting?
For example in L.E.K. Consulting or other LS firms.
Does IQVIA release offer in the name of Foresight IT Solutions And Consulting India Private Limited?
Please confirm asap.
Anyone know where I can buy e-cigarettes /vapes?
Hi All, I've resigned my job on 23rd Sep 2022 for parental reasons. I'm again starting to look for openings now. I'm having 6 yrs experience in Dotnet technology. I'm not able to find much openings after a break. Pls refer me Tata Consultancy Deloitte Accenture EY
You mentioned ATK being a leader in Ops Consulting. What books / white papers / magazines can one read to build such competency (for a newcomer) or to refresh one's know how (a vet in the space)? Tks!
What does HSBC Bangalore provide in welcome kit after onboarding? Headset? Anything else?
How long off on internship does everyone move on to find new jobs? I’m in my internship for around 6 months now and I don’t know if I should just move on.
There are openings in Thoughtworks for Senior Data Engineer
Experience required : 5+years
On Tech Stack : Spark, Scala or Python, SQL, Kafka or spark streaming and any cloud service
Direct message me for referral if you fit the above mentioned criteria
Need some advice for my cousin.
She has done MBA in Finance ,(2018 passout) after BCOM.
Worked in HDFC bank for 2 years (till 2020).
Due to personal reason left job at end of 2020.
Trained in SAP FICO, now trying for certification.
How could she get into IT company(fresher).Capgemini IBM Tata Consultancy
Anyone struggling with mental health? How do you deal with it? Do you disclose to your team/manager? I'm black, young and an immigrant and sadly don't want to add another reason for bias to this list.
My only stress relief this busy season ❤️
Hi Everyone , I have offer from both Amdocs and KPMG . Amdocs is offering me better pay than KPMG But in Amdocs the project is of Development + Support (linx , sql and azure databricks ) and in Kpmg purely Azure based development .
Which one should i join ?
Additional Posts in Politics
Guy whose marriage lasted 8 months has some thoughts about how The Left™️ is assaulting this sacred covenant.
Me, trying to explain what’s going on in politics to myself in 2005:
“OK, so you know Da Ali G Show on HBO?”
I actually think Trump’s shenanigans is healthy for our democracy. For moderates on both sides, this is solidifying the trust in our election system as Trump tries and fails to find flaws.
For non-Americans, how do our elections compare to what you’ve experienced in other countries?
Conservatives concerned about the current political environment/direction we’re heading in: The Rubin Report has a great episode with David Horowitz today. Worth a listen!
Used to think Canada is a better place to live in comparison to US bcz of free healthcare, in fact for a while I was looking for ways to move to Canada. Recently had to do a detailed research of Canada and I realized how misinformed I was 🤦🏻♀️ everything is too expensive:
Car insurance: over 450 a month, cell line with very limited internet access over 80 a month, banks have fees to keep your money, cash your checks, or if you have over a certain number of transactions, wthhhh
These riots are all cool..until your local store is trashed, your car window smashed/set on fire and your family member becomes unemployed.
Trump is the biggest slimeball to walk on this planet. What does it tell you about their supporters ?
Imagine seeing all these far right psycho militias and terrorists and insurrections and being like “the problem with this country is the left”
Don't forget how much time Republicans spent pretending that the guy who was president of the Harvard Law Review was too dumb for the job 😂
I know Trump supporters on here are too embarrassed to side with him on here regarding “stop the count”, “voter fraud” etc. hence the silence.. I hope you can now see him for who he really is 🤡
Thoughts on China 🇨🇳? Will they become superpower or eventually fade by imploding from within?
Any time I have to travel to somewhere south of the Mason-Dixon Line, I’m going to say I’m going to the Confederacy. Because apparently it’s revisionist not too, and it preserves “heritage”
Not over yet
Orange has always been his color!
Kamala Harris says “she won’t go there” when it comes to calling for the filibuster to be carved out to codify Roe. Democrats are truly a weak, spineless party that seem to enjoy letting the minority party strip rights away.
Republicans had no problem overriding the filibuster to force through their Supreme Court justices. Why are Democrats refusing to act?
I am SURE republicans will no longer complain about the process and start to cooperate as soon as this passes...right? Right? Guys?
New to Fishbowl?
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
I think the dems are fine with any justice’s religion. What they’re not fine with is that justice shoving their personal religious beliefs onto every single American by overturning case law that was settled and affirmed many subsequent times decades ago
@OP. Pretty sure Feinstein didn’t say that she was unqualified. Only that some of her quotes regarding religion and law (Notre Dame speech and one other, I think) were concerning. Feinstein later went back due to pressure and reiterated being against any religious test. Not a Dem defender, just wanted to be accurate about what all was being said.
I don’t think any of that is accurate...so, no, they will not
I hope so. About time the dems start playing dirty too
People of praise is NOT a catholic group or recognized by the Holy See and papal ecumenical council.
She’s not your run of the mill catholic. She’s a member of an extreme group with some extreme practices-read for yourself:
Some of the group’s practices would surprise many faithful Catholics. Members of the group swear a lifelong oath of loyalty, called a covenant, to one another, and are assigned and are accountable to a personal adviser, called a “head” for men and a “handmaid” for women. The group teaches that husbands are the heads of their wives and should take authority over the family.
Current and former members say that the heads and handmaids give direction on important decisions, including whom to date or marry, where to live, whether to take a job or buy a home, and how to raise children.”
Whomever gets nominated will dodge this question bigly and will go through but we can enjoy some pointless posturing
Lol... that is the whole purpose of religion. You believe in their version of God and salvation in order to enter the gates of heaven. Same Dogma as Islam and Judaism and any other monotheistic religion. Also, Freedom of religion is protected under the constitution just in case some of you feel the inclination to discriminate against those who practice their personal faith privately.
The point worth arguing about isn’t whether her personal religious beliefs deem her fit to be a judge (justice Scalia was a devout Catholic and while he and RBG were ideological opposites in the Courtroom they happened to be close friends until he passed)
The issue is whether SCOTUS should appoint judges with the inclination to overturn previous precedents, if the ruling is determined to not be in line with the constitution-stare decisis.
As for abortion, the issue no longer is whether American agree it is legal. Even the most conservative state IA has legalized abortion up to 6 weeks. The issue is about the timing, oversight, the balance between the states interest (protecting the potentiality of life-fetus and defining what that means ) and a woman’s right to decide when to abort.
RvW as written is faulty and anachronistic for today’s realities (thanks to advances in medical science) and should be overturned and replaced.
It's pretty dumb to bring up approval polls too - constitutional questions are not referendums
Omg, I got a conservative asking for more government regulation on something that medical professionals have already came up with a mean on the latest to perform abortions. Half a percent of all abortions happen after 24 weeks and almost 100% of those are for life of mother. You act like women are having abortions for fun and that it's not one of the worst days of their lives.
I’ll start believing conservatives actually care about the lives of unborn children when they start supporting things like paid maternal / paternal leave, prenatal healthcare access for everyone regardless of preexisting conditions, mandatory vaccination, public education and pre K, comprehensive sex Ed, and birth control. Until then I will keep ignoring these disingenuous and ignorant arguments.
Hahaha. “Basic Christian belief that only Christians go to heaven”
That is some fringe nonsense. Other religions that believe this are (rightfully) dismissed as crazies. I personally see it as largely incompatible with the first amendment. If you truly believe that your belief is the one true way, then it will be hard to respect others’ divergent choices and you are probably unfit to be a judge.
Okay so OP admits that is isn’t about religion at all - this is about screening for a nominee who will overturn a settled case that OP personally disagrees with (but 67% of Americans support)
TM1: The only yes there is mothers life. That is consistent since it is self defense for the mother... this isn’t complicated. Also, color me surprised that conservatives want laws banning murder... Cool attempted ‘gotcha’ with the regulation argument...
P1: You would have a point is 1 - Sotamayor wasn’t an Obama appointee. With her anti-dogmatic views I am surprised Sonia is still allowed communion. 2 - if Feinstein had any substantive disagreement with Barrett beyond saying the ‘Dogma lives in her’...
Not to mention you haven’t addressed Bernie trying to block a candidate for the basic Christian belief that only Christians go to heaven...
Here's the thing OP, fetuses aren't people just as an egg is not chicken. There is a point when an egg will only be an egg because it hasn't gestate to a point of becoming a chick. When you crack open 3 eggs for an omelet you don't say you're eating chicken. If I drop a dozen eggs I don't people I accidentally killed a dozen chicks. I have no guilt is egging my neighbors house but I'm sure I would never throw a dozen chicks at their door.
And before you get all haughty, no, we're not that different than chicken and as the great Mufasa said "That is the circle of life" so we make them into great bbq.
Ok, but the current law — that very many people agree with — says a fertilized egg isn’t a child. So you can believe whatever you want, but lots of people disagree with that position and therefore want Supreme Court justices that agree with them and not you
Haha can confirm, was quite drunk. But I stand by my point wholeheartedly
If you’re so concerned about child’s rights that you think it gives you the right to have control over what another woman does with her body, then surely you extend these draconian principles to all aspects of your principles when it comes to children’s well being.
The problem though, unfortunately, is that the conservative viewpoint is not at all about protecting the lives of children. By painting a picture of women as promiscuous sluts who like to use abortion when they find condoms inconvenient, conservatives like to paint abortion as this thing that people use en mass when there are other options available. The truth, far darker and uncomfortable but necessary, is that abortion is a tool that people use when they truly have no other options. I don’t think anyone would argue with you that abortion in an ideal world would be not only safe and legal, But also very rare. Nobody wants more abortions, but what they do why it is that this practice be legal and regulated so that when it’s necessary people can use it. Do you want to overturn Roe V Wade to save the lives of children and clutch your pearls? If that happens, the number of abortions are going to go down, but the number of women who survived the procedure when it’s needed will.
Look up and read the article called “the only moral abortion is my abortion“. I think it will open your eyes a little bit to the possibilities of when people need to turn to an unpleasant medical procedure that nobody is denying is not the most wanted thing, but some people have legitimate necessary reasons to do it. Your lack of imagination as to why someone might actually have a legitimate reason to terminate the pregnancy, and once the right to choose that decision for themselves and to make that decision, coupled with your lack of trust that your fellow humans can make that decision for themselves and that you know better for them, is frankly very saddening.
(Apologies for any typos - Siri sucks and I’m too lazy to go back and re-edit on my phone)
My point is that conservatives are not actually against abortion because it’s “murder” because that’s either a complete misunderstanding of biology or a convenient excuse for an ideology designed to demonize women’s sexuality and independence. I can’t decide which one you are, and i don’t care because You’re not on the Supreme Court (to get back to the point of your original question long ago)
I support any potential justice being disqualified if they espouse this bullshit and use their religion to justify it, and that’s what the senator was asking about in the prior hearing.
All That said, there are other catholic justices in our system, up to and including on the Supreme Court. Many of them have had widespread democratic support. So, your argument that this is some religious crusade against Christians is just not true anyway
EY1: She said she was unqualified when she voted against her... Not to mention her question was on taking a statement completely out of context and when ask directly about her views Barrett clearly stated that her jurisprudence is different from her personal religious beliefs.
You also have the example of Bernie trying to block a different nominee from the circuit court because he thought the judge was an “islamaphobe’ for having the basic Christian belief that only Christians go to heaven.
PWC1: So you think SCOTUS shouldn’t overturn previous case law that has been affirmed many subsequent times over multiple decades?