Related Posts
Does SAP SDC provide any mobile phone device?
MAGA!!!
America first!!!
Winning!!!

Additional Posts in Climate Change and Sustainability
Any LEED certified folks here willing to chat?
Has anyone taken the SASB FSA exams? Any advice?
New to Fishbowl?
Download the Fishbowl app to
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.







Don't despair. Climate denialism has rebranded itself as Climate Doomism, shown by a lot of YouTube data (linked below).
Doomists use niahlistic arguments as an excuse to drag feet and not act. All part of the 5 Ds: deflection, delay, division, despair and doomism
While it's unlikely GDP growth and sustainability can both coexist and our economies need to be fundamentally rewired across consumerism to much more aggressive policies, don't lose hope.
Every .1 degrees of warming we can stop and slow down equates to less chronic and acute climate risks, which link to health and worse outcomes for all.
Keep fighting, and remember it's a privilege to be paid to work on a passion area and make a difference, even if it's a small one. It's our greatest call to action ever in human history and youre on the front line
https://www.ft.com/content/aa369295-1805-414c-af99-3c7596df0847
I think we are at a tipping point. Policies are slow to develop and basically not enforced. Companies and organizations often do the bare minimum to get by and are involved in, or have massive influence on, these policies. The capitalist system which drives many economies, by its nature, does not benefit from doing what is really needed to change things. We would need to stop using fossil fuels. We would need to have better resource management in place. We would have to make decisions without profit being the main priority. That doesn’t work in the current system. I appreciate that you are trying to shed a positive light but I think that’s been part of why we’re here. It’s been the idea that every little bit helps and we are doing what we can. I get that. But, it isn’t enough. We need swift, short-term, global solutions and those don’t exist outside of emergency situations for the most part. My hope is that the younger generations, who are way more fed up with these systems, will create something better.
I’m ready Ministry for the Future - and omg chapter 15 summarizes my professional and academic goals & frustrations so beautifully.
We have to find the levers we can pull, and be inspired by the communication & behavioral economics lessons provided by folks like George Marshall and Daniel Kahneman.
There is a “fierce urgency now” and perhaps we have to reboot our communication skills to convey that, bring people along, acknowledge how big the transformation is, and what role each of us has to play in it.
I like this idea. Bringing people together is really the only way forward. División gets us nowhere.
Teaching is very rewarding and important but it also doesn’t pay well typically. If you are staying in sustainable endeavors for the money be prepared to not find an income close to what you are earning. Many teaching jobs require teaching certifications and or advanced degrees that often require a doctorate and may still pay minimum wages. I’m a passionate educator who has not been able to support myself without having another stream of income
Staying in a sustainable position is not ideal because you may not be optimally operating at your highest possible level meaning that enough people doing the same slows down the pace towards sustainability goals which is unsustainable if the field is flooded with like minded people
There are no easy answers to your dilemma. I feel for you as I get how awesome it is to have work experience that you love. Perhaps people like us should come up with something to answer this quandary as no doubt we are not alone!
It would help if the field of education was one that commands respect and is held in higher regard than just above the lowest tiers of occupational fields. It seems that people in general don’t make any connections that to have any career hierarchy means that there must be education meaning that it is foundational to every other profession.
Unless we destroy capitalism and the mindset of profit, we will never be sustainable… so yes, I feel like my work is pointless.
Having been on both sides of the fence. I have to say if you sincerely want to turn towards education as a vocation be prepared to live spartan like and or have another full time job as teachers, except the privileged, don’t necessarily make a living wage. The satisfaction is tremendous as you mentioned. Look at teaching across all ages and populations because the basic knowledge about the environment is abismel at best.
You do realize that for the vast majority of earth's history, global mean temperatures have been significantly warmer than they are right now. We are still coming out of an ice age, so regardless of whether any SUVs were being driven around, global temperatures would be rising. Sea levels are also relatively low compared to the majority of earth's history. The rock record shows that biodiversity actually increases with temperatures, so picking an arbitrary moment in time in the late 1970's as the "global temperature ideal" is the height of human arrogance. Climate changes, That's what it does. Always has, always will. Thinking we can get it to stop changing and stay where it's at right now that's "juuuust right" like some global goldilocks thermostat is ridiculous and flies in the face of actual science. If you recognize this and accept the obvious fact that it's all about wealth redistribution and control, you'll be much happier. If you have any doubt, just watch how many of the global elite will travel by fly private jet to the next COP meeting rather than attending virtually. You can then go about your day going where you want, when you want, and eating what you want just like they do while sleeping just fine at night.
I’m not sure what science you refer to. The climate change debate is based on the fact that humans have accelerated natural processes in unnatural and unprecedented ways since the beginning of the Industrial Revolution which is a term of less than 200 years. The drivers are human beings and that’s the whole point.
Make my work over the last few years has been very focused on the energy transition and I disagree with you on three points:
1) Climate change is not an existential threat. People who believe that tend to be political, uninformed, or both. None of the serious scientific literature supports the idea that we’re all dead in a few decades from CO2. We have a responsibility to care for the Earth, but climate change is not going to kill off humanity.
2) It’s naive to think you can rebuild global systems that took decades to build and trillions of dollars to finance in 5 years. The call on natural resources to get to net zero is astronomical and will cost more than $250 TRILLION. Like point number 1, thinking that this is an easy call broadcasts an unserious about the topic.
3) It’s also ignorant to dismiss the changes that are already occurring. Policies are rapidly changing, technology is advancing, and massive amounts of capital are forming to reduce the carbon intensity of the global economy.
I think we’re seeing the close of the opening act on the Energy Transition where magical thinking is all too common. We’re beginning to see the required trade offs and hard choices we have to make. But we’re also seeing advances in technology that can be very useful. Don’t underestimate how rapidly things can accelerate once you get on the proper timescale. More than a quarter of the global population has risen from subsistence living to global middle class standards in less than 40 years, all while the energy intensity to drive economic growth has fallen significantly in both OECD and developing economies. Getting the first quarter of people out of subsistence living took centuries and significant leaps in energy intensity. That alone is a major feat.
Don’t be discouraged, but you do need to reset your expectations.
In the thread comments seem to be wavering back and forth between being right or wrong in one another’s opinions. The point is that all of them are right because to solve the Anthropocene ecosystem problems humanity faces means that all types, kinds, modes are required. That’s the point I was trying to make here a few comments back. I wish there was more communication about all sectors needed beyond energy and transportation.