Related Posts
Is Toronto as boring and quiet as this bowl ?
Additional Posts in Artificial Intelligence
New to Fishbowl?
Download the Fishbowl app to
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Is Toronto as boring and quiet as this bowl ?
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Download the Fishbowl app to unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Copy and paste embed code on your site

Scan your QR code to download
Fishbowl app on your mobile

I think AI art is crappy and not anything I want to “co-create mythology” with now or later. Especially when this crappy art is ruining our environment for low value add.
“You know what the biggest problem with pushing all-things-AI is? Wrong direction. I want AI to do my laundry and dishes so that I can do art and writing, not for AI to do my art and writing so that I can do my laundry and dishes.” — Joanna Maciejewska
AI definitely opens up new possibilities for storytelling, but it also challenges our traditional role as creators. I think we might be at the beginning of a new era where we collaborate with AI to shape our stories, blending human creativity with technology in unexpected ways.
AI isn't generating anything, it's repurposing material it scraped. You can ask it to produce something and it can mimic what you're asking for. But it's not going to produce Ulysses or Tropic of Cancer or Hemingway's short stories. Facile mimicry is not art.
AA nailed it. AI isn't creating anything, it's simply mimicking patterns. It's worthless without the source material, which I think human beings will always have a hand in creating.
It's important to remember that this isn't our only option. We can have a say in how much of who we are that it "erases". We can reject companies that use AI art and content. We can refuse to buy books with AI covers or that were written with AI. Most importantly, we can be loud and push for government regulations so that anything created with AI must be labeled as such.