Related Posts
Coforge does a background verification check?
Additional Posts in Personal Injury Lawyers
New to Fishbowl?
Download the Fishbowl app to
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Coforge does a background verification check?
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Download the Fishbowl app to unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Copy and paste embed code on your site

Scan your QR code to download
Fishbowl app on your mobile

Separate demands. Other than crash facts being the same, each client’s recovery and personal impact is different and should be talked about.
You can talk about everyone’s damages in the same demand. That’s what headings are for.
Just a little extra thought, make sure you handle the conflict potential properly. I catch my team slipping often.
I agree. this was something that came to mind, whether it would pose a potential conflict in the future. It is Parent/child, where the child just turned 18 and only suffered soft tissue injuries.
One demand with breakout of each medicals with Client approval, this generally works
This!
Depend on the purpose of the demand. If you have a policy limit case with all your clients, and one of your hopes is that they don’t accept and thus open the policy, then only do global. In fact, if i don’t represent all the injured parties i will call the other plaintiff lawyer and we will demand the policy jointly and agree to mediate/arbitrate among ourselves if there is a dispute as to allocation. Global demands for policy limits open policies. Separate demand won’t do it. If it’s a huge policy that you have no chance of opening, then it doesn’t matter.
Agree with Attorney 3 - 100%
Always separate
Why is this wrong? Is it a state by state thing or are you saying its wrong ethically? Because we have always sent out separate demands too and I am not sure why that would be wrong.