Related Posts
I’m already exhausted 🥱

Additional Posts in Insurance Litigation
New to Fishbowl?
Download the Fishbowl app to
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
I’m already exhausted 🥱

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Download the Fishbowl app to unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Copy and paste embed code on your site

Scan your QR code to download
Fishbowl app on your mobile

I think there’s many. There are bigger firms who don’t focus on ID and don’t derive a lot of their revenue from carriers but by virtue of having big litigation practices and a lot of different clients, these firms end up having to deal with carriers (or self insureds who consume litigation services just like carriers) for some of their cases or large coordinated litigations. It’s getting harder to avoid carriers as they are expanding their business lines to life sciences, epli, etc. Morgan Lewis, Duane Morris, Greenberg Traurig, Blank Rome come to mind. But I don’t think they necessarily have an ID practice (at least as it’s defined in the traditional sense) that they advertise. But I think the definition of ID really has changed as carriers keep expanding their lines.
Would ID rates be able to handle big law?
None
None. Insurers live for volume discounts and firms of that size don’t play that game.