Related Posts
New to Fishbowl?
Download the Fishbowl app to
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Download the Fishbowl app to unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Copy and paste embed code on your site

Scan your QR code to download
Fishbowl app on your mobile

That’s a tough one. I’d say the executives have the power to make positive culture, but often don’t. Usually comes down to the employees having to and that’s hard to do if leadership isn’t supportive.
Saying it is the easy part, stands to reason that it’s offloaded onto others to actually uphold. I can understand executives are often outside the day-to-day, but management isn’t, and it’s a constant effort to keep the culture decent.
Rising Star
It's a mix I wouldn't go as far as executives but higher management and their attitude affect middle management which affects employees.
Rising Star
Indeed, it’s a domino effect
In my experience, it is usually the employees that contribute the most to the culture. Of course upper management does make an impact. But overall, the employees are the ones who contribute the most to the culture.
Rising Star
Makes sense, since employees are literally who make up of the company and create the environment (along with management, who sets and implements the standard)
Executives push down what they want. The end unit level dictates how it will be.