Related Posts
Which is better for SAP? PwC or IBM or EY?
New to Fishbowl?
Download the Fishbowl app to
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Which is better for SAP? PwC or IBM or EY?
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Download the Fishbowl app to unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Copy and paste embed code on your site

Scan your QR code to download
Fishbowl app on your mobile

This is perpetually the way it is done. I have been in the B4 from when it was the B8, and that was a common complaint back then. Just assume that a staff 2 is making a couple of grand more than a staff 1. When next year rolls around, the new staff 1s will be pushed upward again, and the levels above will be "just a few grand more".
Yep, right when I started.
I guess the question is how many years of experience do you have and what do you consider close? I see alot of staff with a year of experience or seniors with 2-3 years total and feel they should be making 30k more then new hires. Reality is in a few months most new hires should be doing similar work to what you’re doing so normally the difference I’ve seen between new hires and seniors (depending on how senior) is 10-20k.
That's why some people feel it's better to change companies every 2-3 years. When the economy is good you have a better chance at promotions and better pay raises by changing companies every couple years, instead of staying with one for 10-20+ years. And this is easier for the younger generations in the workplace than the older ones that are near retirement age.
Thanks for sharing
I left my firm when I was making less than the new hires I was training.