Rome, Milan or Venice? And why?
Related Posts
How much does registered nurse make ?
Hello RSM coworkers! I am thrilled to be moving to RSM into a Scheduler roll. I just found out yesterday and want to be as prepared as possible in the next steps.
So here are my questions.
How long does the background study take? I'm guessing admin staff have a study that is faster and less complicated than someone in Tax ect.
When training at home what did you need that wasn't supplied by RSM? My home office is well stocked but I want to be as prepared as possible.
Thanks in advance!
Additional Posts in Travel Recommendations
Where’s the fishbowl hangout in BOG?
Does anyone have any tips for Napa Valley? 🍷🍽🥗
Recommendations for montana?
Conversation Starter
New to Fishbowl?
Download the Fishbowl app to
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Rome and it’s not even close. More culturally/historically interesting than Venice. Cooler vibe than Milan.
Make sure you stay in Trastevere, not the more central tourist areas. Amazing food at amazing prices in Trastevere
Rome in the summer at night is the most romantic place in the world
If you can only visit one it really depends on what you are looking for. My vote is Rome though. This history is amazing to see, it’s a really cool city, super easy to jump on the train and head to the amalfi coast (even just for a day) which is absolutely beautiful.
Conversation Starter
Rome. History and very Italian
Milan. Little history. Least Italian of all major cities in Italy
Venice. Tony tourist trap
But the correct answer is Florence
Depends on your interest. For me Rome is like NY, i.e. a city you have to see at least once. Milano has less things to see but near Milano you have the nicest lakes in the world (small cities around the lakes wich are very pretty. So again, depends on your interest
Rome, without a doubt.
Milan is Italy’s Dallas: it’s just a commercial hub with little to see in the way of historical significance, but convenient to fly into.
Venice is a tourist trap. You really shouldn’t spend more than 36 hours there.
Rome has the most to see and do.
Honestly, if it were me, I’d fly into Milan, rent a car, and then head south to Florence and Siena. Both have great vibes, history, and aren’t as overrun as Rome in the summer.
Why not Florence?
I’d skip Milan.
Rome is epic but crowded. Venice, at the right time of year (not dead of summer), is amazing. But small and not worth a whole trip.
Agree with all above. Rome is awesome. I’d live in Milan but didn’t need more than a day as a tourist there. And I checked Venice off the bucket list but wouldn’t go back.
I agree that rome has the most to see and do, plus the best history and culture! And easier to deal with weather too. If it rains or is chilly in Venice you’re just going to get cold and wet- not the mention flooding. It’s a little easier to stay out of the elements in rome and still have a good time.
Rome, Florence, Venice, and Rome.
What time of year? That changes my answer. Been to all 3 in the summer and I’ve been to all 3 in the winter.
Thanksgiving time