Related Posts
New to Fishbowl?
Download the Fishbowl app to
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Download the Fishbowl app to unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Copy and paste embed code on your site

Scan your QR code to download
Fishbowl app on your mobile

It can go both ways. But honestly if you’re older and you’re still bouncing around a lot, it just looks like you’re not committed.
I mean I've switched like 5 or 6 jobs since 2023 myself that's because it's based on management. I manage to try to stay for a year but most of the time it's 6 months or 9. I was at a job for almost a year when they stopped giving me hours
Yes employers definitely review how long you stay with a job and it can definitely impact your chances of being hired depending on the manager. 6 jobs within a 5 year period can be seen as a lot and show a lack of commitment. However, entry level positions do have a high-turnover rate. If you have had 6 jobs within a 5 year period, that would be around 10 months on average which isn’t bad in comparison to a 3-6 month average in a retail setting.
Chief
I’d imagine it’s really up to the person reviewing the resume. I look at longevity when I review them, but I am not super harsh if I see a 6 month stint here or there. However, if this is what a bulk of your resume looks like, I see lack of committment, but also the affects of hiring someone such as that person. Just think, you’ll have to hire and train someone in less than a year for this position, which is not something a company would like to do. 10 months+ at a place is pretty good, but if every job is less than a year, most employers would probably second guess hiring you