Rising Star
Related Posts
Tata Consultancy Infosys Cognizant Wipro I have completed all the technical and HR rounds and salary discussion, documents submission also done. But all of sudden got mail from hr saying that my profile is kept on hold. Any possibility that I will receive offer letter or it will be in hold forever? Meantime can I attend interview for other positions in hcl?
Bowl Leader
More Posts
Got a random email from a supposed Amazon recruiter for a SDE position (which is not at all a fit). The email is amazon.com domain and there are no red flags in the body but it doesn't feel like an Amazon recruiter due to the tacky signature, etc. Has anyone seen this kind of cold-calling from FAANG recruiter?
LI a cringe exists beyond LI
Boutique vs T2? All else equal
New to Fishbowl?
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
....that's not normal. It's called "salary range" for a reason - it refers to salary and salary alone. Or at least it should. This is very weird.
Rising Star
That was my understanding too. When I saw the base come in under the posted range, it caught me off guard. I always assumed the range referred to base pay, with benefits discussed separately as part of the total comp conversation.
Have you ever seen companies justify this by framing it as “total compensation,” or is this more likely just a case of poor transparency in the posting?
Pro
I would absolutely challenge that. Save the JD and show them what was in there. Hold them to it. This is why there are laws around salary transparency.
Rising Star
That’s a fair point about documenting the original posting. Transparency laws were meant to make ranges clearer for candidates, so when the explanation shifts after the offer stage, it raises questions about how the range was actually intended. At the same time, I’m trying to figure out whether this is a compliance issue or just a compensation philosophy difference around “total comp.” In your experience, have you seen companies successfully defend this approach when candidates push back on it?
Wow, I have never heard of that before. I really hope that isn't something new. I don't think a range should include the benefits package.
Rising Star
That was my reaction too. If benefits are bundled into the range without clearly stating it upfront, it can create a very different expectation for candidates walking into the process. Most people read a salary range as base pay and then evaluate benefits separately. Do you think this might start becoming more common as companies try to frame offers around total compensation, or do you think candidates would push back on that pretty quickly?
They should be transparent and list it as a "total rewards package." Some companies can be shady, and they believe that will make a difference. People expect that these other things will be ON TOP of the posted salary. Definitely a bait-and-switch red flag.
I’ve never heard of that. Can you still see range posted to see if they disclosed that?
Rising Star
Thanks for pointing this out .
I have seen the "total compensation package" used a lot more, lately. I try to get confirmation on the screening call (with recruiter not hiring manager) so I don't waste time pursing something that might not be a fit.
This seemingly bait and switch is a red flag. Are they even bothering to look into it/take responsibility? If not, maybe take the job for now, but keep looking at the same time. Because, if they start off that way, who knows what other shenanigans lie ahead. As they say people (in this case, companies) show you exactly who they are, we just don't pay attention.