Related Posts
Salary credit timings? Icici bank
Is it weekend yet? 🥱

Additional Posts in Law
New to Fishbowl?
Download the Fishbowl app to
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Salary credit timings? Icici bank
Is it weekend yet? 🥱

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Download the Fishbowl app to unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Copy and paste embed code on your site

Scan your QR code to download
Fishbowl app on your mobile

I don’t know how much any of them cost but Harvey is good.
We use Harvey and it’s pretty good, but I hear Spellbook may be better. Not sure how much either costs though
I use Harvey Legora draftwise and perplexity. Perplexity is by far the best for certain tasks but generally I like Legora. Problem with Legora is its word plugin stops working too often, so I use Harvey when that happens. For perplexity I use claud’s opus or sonnet.
Draftwise is only good if you’re at an actual law firm because it finds precedents from your internal database - would probably be useless to in house.
These ai services have become so good in the past year or so that I potentially could just replace half of what my juniors do with a combination of these services.
Just get a Claude subscription. Claude for Legal is designed for in-house teams.
Chief
GCAI is amazing
tbh all those tools are essentially chatgpt wrappers, get an entprise subscription of gpt. load up ur templates and tell ur engineers to make a GPT based off ur templates
Agreed, though a ChatGPT wrapper doesn’t usually have a word plugin, which I use to essentially cut down time I spend on last review from tons of time to like one minute. This is for spell check, defined terms references, etc.
I think that’s where a wrapper differs, although idk how this tech is implemented with a wrapper, so disregard if my post is not factually correct
Also in my experience Anthropic is waaaaaay better than ChatGPT now. Use anthropic’s models if you can