Related Posts
Finally, after a successful first edition last year, we are pleased to introduce an even bigger and better version of learning and networking for our community: 𝗜𝗻𝗳𝗼𝘀𝗲𝗰 𝗙𝘂𝘀𝗶𝗼𝗻 𝟮.𝟬
It is the most comprehensive event available to IT professionals to gain insights on the cloud fundamentals and key technical topics like XDR, Zero Trust, DNS Security, DevSecOps, CSPM, CASB, SASE, SOC, SOAR, SAST, Micro Services, and many more!
To know more: https://cyberfrat.com/isf2
Date: 13th to 15th August, 2022.

ONE p&t partner? yikes.
Hey Guys,
A samaritan is creating a dashboard for us to help understand the market standards for your skillset and help us to realize if we are underpaid!? And this helps us to negotiate as well
Share your responses here..
Suggestions are welcome.. Will update dashboard link in the below page itself ☺
Let's work together 😎
Please do share below links with your friends and besties from work and help them too...
https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSdRBRC8b5J2DAPR33xmhnUxEX40UsPTvQVfN3r
Additional Posts in In-House Counsel
New to Fishbowl?
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.





It just starts over because being in house is a new set of skills. You’re starting over in a way. Just gotta live with it. It’s part of learning.
I have effed up many times while in house… honestly, things move so fast that you have to learn to let it roll off your back. And to take ownership and come up with a path forward proactively. That being said, I do think the expectation of perfection is higher at a firm
It's very different. I try to continually improve, but my standards are lower than in firm life because the competencies of a lot of the people I work with is also lower or different - sales reps who truly don't care about following protocol if they can close a deal, junior corporate folks with no worldly experience, etc. Firm level standards just caused me frustration when I applied them
Conversation Starter
I think in a way it’s worse in-house as you generally have more ownership. Like your mistakes come out at the highest level instead of being caught by a partner. Or get caught after the fact, after which clean-up duty is required.
That being said, I do think the standard is higher at a firm. I think a partner will catch most things. While mistakes at an in-house level…for example, I’ve seen predecessors for my in-house counsel job get away with some pretty glaring errors that nobody caught.
It gets better. Firm culture puts extreme pressure on 100% accuracy and no mistakes, ever. In-house works like real like; some things are really important and you can’t eff up, some things are medium, and some things you just do quick and move on.
Conversation Starter
It’s better in house in terms of the day to day because if you have a good team, you really don’t sweat the small stuff and no one cares or judges you over minor inconsequential mistakes like typos. Obviously the big things are still important, like not missing major deadlines that impact the business’s bottom line, and there’s more ownership required in general so you need to feel comfortable owning your mistakes (like with any job). But I’ve found my anxiety has gone wayyyy down (nonexistent really) and in house life is so much better, because people are less neurotic and only the truly important things matter!
I think this has more to do with the individual than the setting in which they practice. If you tend to beat yourself up, as I do, then you will continue to beat yourself up when you move from a firm to in-house.
Rising Star
Way better. Because there’s often a lot of tolerance for low level risk (so long as you answer questions with “it’s probably ok, we see this as low risk”)