Related Posts
How much MDs (level 4) make in Canada?
Additional Posts in Ask A Recruiter - Law
New to Fishbowl?
Download the Fishbowl app to
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
How much MDs (level 4) make in Canada?
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Download the Fishbowl app to unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Copy and paste embed code on your site

Scan your QR code to download
Fishbowl app on your mobile

I say take it. It’s not as big of a step down in comp as it could be. Plus companies are more likely to hire someone with some in house experience than more firm experience. So grind it out for a year or so then try to make a move to a better paying in house job
Assuming in house means better quality of life and you can absorb the paycut, absolutely take it.
That’s still a decent salary, esp for fully remote. I would take it and consider the extra time saved as money.
I agree, if it is fully remote, you can handle the pay cut, better benefits, work life balance and opportunities to grow, I would take it. Maybe see if you can negotiate up to $170,000?
I’d ask if they can meet you halfway at 170k. But I’d take it.
I’d also take, as in-house jobs also have benefits like insurance and real PTO.
Look at the total package, including benefits, retirement, etc. You may be looking at less of a cut than you think. Plus, take into account how much you save in commuting costs, dry cleaning, meals, etc. by working from home.
Fully remote is the gem, I would take it