Related Posts
10/23 Thread (BC):
Marsh & McLennan Hi Fishes,
I am currently serving notice period and 30th sept 2022 is my LWD.
Role : Java App Support Analyst
Tech stack : Java,Linux,SQL,ITIL, Jenkins
Current CTC : 5.7LPA
I have offer from Marsh : 14.LPA fixed + 10% variable
BOA is offering 13.5 LPA Fixed+ 1.5 JB
However, BOA is giving DOJ as 7 Novemeber.
I am looking for your suggestions which one to join. Kindly help.
Bank of America Marsh McLennan
Any campus recruiters here. Please DM me
Additional Posts in Tech Strategy & Product
Hi All, My sister has done Computer Science engineering Bachelor degree and has 5 years of work experience in India. She is applying for MBA at https://www.kenan-flagler.unc.edu/programs/mba/full-time-mba/ and https://kelley.iu.edu/programs/full-time-mba/academics/majors-minors/marketing.html. Her overall goal is to get into Software Product management. Any suggestions if any of these MBA’s can open path in the desired space or if she is better of doing an MS in Comp engg. to further develop deeper Technology skills. Thanks
AWS vs Amazon PM roles?
New to Fishbowl?
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.




Mentor
AI is regulated. It's regulated by all of the existing industry, consumer protection, privacy, etc. regulations that already apply to all kinds of consumer technology and services. It doesn't need it's own thing. It's just alarmist politicians and moral panic critical that feel the need to throw badly crafted new regs at every innovation.
Mentor
In an actual product, not R&D? Actual uptake of AI that is explainable and used specifically because it's explainable over a black box model that works as well or better but lacks explainability either of the underlying mechanics or the human-centric interpretation of decision-making.
There's lots of buzz but I have yet to see anybody doing anything systemic. It's a fun area for research. But Black Boxes are still preferred for real world applications.
And none of the proposed regulations, or the EU AI Act, are requiring AI black boxes convert to white. They just require people be informed about training data sets and the fact that they are interacting with AI, the latter already being required by existing regulations.
Lobbyists > Lawmakers
I’ve seen so much ink about the bill Newsom vetoed, but he also signed 17 others into law.
https://www.whitecase.com/insight-alert/raft-california-ai-legislation-adds-growing-patchwork-us-regulation
Anyone saying that existing consumer protections are sufficient for AI is saying that:
1. AI presents no substantive change, and
2. Existing regulations are already sufficient
Appreciate the thoughtful reply! Have a good day.