Related Posts
Best/worst experiences as a law clerk?
Additional Posts in Law
New to Fishbowl?
Download the Fishbowl app to
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Best/worst experiences as a law clerk?
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Download the Fishbowl app to unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Copy and paste embed code on your site

Scan your QR code to download
Fishbowl app on your mobile

Not a shill. The West and Lexis products are okay at best. Tavern's product is far better, but I wouldn't exactly pound the table for it. A seasoned human will do better than any of them. Sure, AI will save some time, but it will also create higher expectations to perform more work including work beyond the existing job description. Proofing AI against records rather than writing myself will take a lot of the skill out of the job. And then the time saved will have to be spent on other tasks. It's disconcerting.
Well it sounds like your point is not to use AI at all, and unfortunately that’s where we are headed. No way around it.
Have your paralegal or legal assistant do shell and TOA… I have not touch a TOA since law school lol
Ha. That’s a WHOLE other issue at our firm. I just told my paralegal to learn how to do this in 60 days and she complained about having to do it. I’m like uhhh you should know how to do this anyway.
Chief
Are you trying to get it to do research, or to recycle your existing work product?
Chief
It’s required in CA. You can pretend to be a paralegal and call P’s paralegal and ask them to send. It’s never not worked.
I also used to include it in any stip for e-service; gotta also send word versions of discovery.
For a TOA you need to use the Westlaw drafting assistant not co-counsel. I suggest getting additional training from Westlaw on co-counsel. You won't ever get a fileable document but it will help you cut down on busy work. Work that we never considered possible is now easy and gets implemented in every file. Example, we load all discovery the Corp rep has to know and the topics and co-counsel finds all relevant documents by topic and provided a summary to help Corp rep prep for the deposition. We load all expert related manuals and white papers and all co-counsel to evaluate the expert report against industry and help come up with depo questions to dig into the technical opinions. So far we find it useful.
We don’t have drafting assistant. But Shouldn’t cocounsel be able to that then? My point is … it shouldn’t take more training for cocounsel to spit out a discovery response template. It should be a VERY basic function. It should be as easy as: “hi please draft a template response to the attached demands” and maybe just maybe “here’s an example … use this.” If I need more training for that to work, then it’s not simple, and I might as well just do them myself.
Definitely not legawrite
I think the biggest flaw with those tools is the lack of structured data. Even though they have all the documents, the Ai eventually hits a context limit and if you rely completely on the ai, it hallucinates a lot.
I actually build AI systems, and we're trying to prevent those exact headaches. Our approach is that summaries and drafts always need attorney review (we call it ai provenance). The whole idea is to keep the liability on the human expert, not the bot. also, when we need things like citations or a TOA, we don't even use AI. We just use structured data. If you already have the info in the documents, there's simply no need to risk an AI hallucinating a toa. I work on a tool called Casefriend (we focus on workers' comp/civil lit) if thats any help
We use CoPilot Chat