Related Posts
“Not to throw you under the bus” but I will 😎
What will be the in-hand for this offer?

Additional Posts in Big Law
New to Fishbowl?
Download the Fishbowl app to
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
“Not to throw you under the bus” but I will 😎
What will be the in-hand for this offer?

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Download the Fishbowl app to unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Copy and paste embed code on your site

Scan your QR code to download
Fishbowl app on your mobile

If you go somewhere with a free market system you can always say no to work. This is why despite K&E’s reputation, I think it’s easier to bill moderate hours there than at STB (which has central staffing).
So it’s true that funds’ staffing model makes it harder to control your hours since you’re generally staffed to the client long-term. However, I think there’s a lot to be said for being by able to say no to initial staffing, because it means you can avoid working with certain toxic personalities at the firm or clients with a reputation for non stop fire drills.
Im in funds and bill like 40/45 hours a week consistently and I think im considered a relatively busy associate and haven’t received any pressure to bill more than this. Happy to chat.
I think it’s just due to the merger and all the change but overall day to day in the funds group is the same as before the merger imo.
Subject Expert
This sounds like a normal practice. You need to just become more efficient, I think.
F
Nothing really to add but was at a chamber’s rank band3 funds practice. Basically did this for 3.5 years but more weekends. Billed ~2200, 2500, 2300 in the three years after stub year. Recently left to go in house. Couldn’t do this any longer although enjoyed the people and think I was very well liked and reviewed. Prob could have made partner if I stayed
I would be a millionaire now if I was good at tech and joined Nvidia a couple years ago.