Related Posts
Additional Posts in Pharma and Health Advertising
New to Fishbowl?
Download the Fishbowl app to
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Download the Fishbowl app to unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Copy and paste embed code on your site

Scan your QR code to download
Fishbowl app on your mobile

Do both if you can!!
Do both!
You would not be burning bridges if you just say that you had something already booked. The worry is that you might get replaced. But when you are on month to month, stability is never there for you. If you think the new project will help your book, go for it.
Assuming you’re WFH, do both.
This.
Most agencies won’t blame you if you don’t renew with them because you have a better, longer, or higher-paying opportunity.
To me, it would depend how long the new opportunity is for. If the new place is guaranteeing several months of work, then I’d let my current agency know. And ask the current place if they could book me for a similar or longer amount of time.
Why not both
Community Builder
Do both and then take a month off to relax
One is 40 hours and the other is 37 hours. Just seems like a lot and managing my calendar could get weird
The holding company also has a strict policy against billing for wait time. So they can't say you aren't allowed to work another job. Their lawyers could get themselves into a lot of trouble
You should have a gig renewal at least two weeks in advance of your expiration date. It would not be burning bridges if you were to move on, because it would be assumed that your contract is not being renewed if it is within the two week window.