Pro
Related Posts
Community Builder
#hiringurgently at °Nomad Health which is a HealthcareTech company that is the first digital marketplace for healthcare jobs, efficiently connecting quality clinicians with rewarding career opportunities. Hiring urgently for these 2 roles listed below, be sure to apply DIRECTLY ONLY through those special referral links listed below:
1.) Senior Accountant- https://grnh.se/907a22374us
2.) FP&A Senior Manager- https://grnh.se/c93c17e14us
Hello Sharks, My HR interview is scheduled with an US MNC for one of the niche skills in MarTech space for an IT consultant role. May I know how much salary should I expect? I am expecting around 35 to 45 LPA My current CTC is 18 LPA and YOE 10 years. This is a fully remote position
Accenture Tata Consultancy Deloitte Adobe
More Posts
Glad to refer to Deloitte, DM me!
Wordle 524 2/6
🟩⬜⬜🟨⬜
🟩🟩🟩🟩🟩
Additional Posts in Salaries in Healthcare
New to Fishbowl?
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
It's hard to say how much AI is actually part of the process with that very vague language. I think AI should have no part in the "human" resources process, but that's just me.
Pro
Yeah, I totally get the frustration; the vague wording always feels like they're hiding something, doesn't it? I don't think AI should be completely banned from HR either, but I agree it shouldn't be the one making the big calls. Stuff like initial resume screening or scheduling interviews? Sure, AI can handle the boring, repetitive parts and save everyone time. But when it comes to actually evaluating a person's fit, potential, or personality, especially the nuanced stuff that doesn't show up on paper that absolutely needs human judgment. Too many stories out there of AI systems rejecting great candidates because of weird keyword gaps or hidden biases in the training data.
Wow! This is the first time I’ve heard of an organization, being honest. I think most organizations have been using AI tools to scan resumes and decide who’s worth meeting. But they just haven’t been telling us about it.
Pro
Right? It’s actually kind of shocking when a company just comes out and says it instead of burying it in fine print or pretending everything’s still done by hand.
You’re 100% right that most places have been quietly using AI for years by resume screening, keyword matching, even those weird “personality assessment” quizzes that feel like they’re judging you harder than a human ever would. They don’t advertise it because they know people hate the idea of a bot deciding whether you get a shot.
The line is pretty clear for me. AI for admin tasks like scheduling interviews, parsing resumes for basic keywords, things like that. Deciding whether someone gets a callback is a bridge too far for me. We've already got to contend with ATS, and that's bad enough.
Pro
Totally fair line to draw! I’m right there with you. Using AI to handle the grunt work like pulling keywords, flagging basic requirements, or juggling calendars makes sense; it frees up humans to do the actual human stuff.
But letting it decide who gets a callback? That’s where it starts feeling like you’re applying to a black box instead of a company. ATS systems were sold as “efficiency tools,” but half the time they’re just keyword gatekeepers that toss out perfectly qualified people because their resume didn’t phrase something exactly the way the algorithm likes. Adding another layer of AI judgment on top of that just amplifies the frustration.
That’s a great point! AI can help sort through applications quickly, which is handy. But you're right deciding who to meet should stay human. It’s all about finding the right balance. AI should assist, not take over.