Related Posts
Who is planning for next year's draft?
How many hours a week do you ACTUALLY work?
Additional Posts in Big Law
When the partner asks why I missed his deadline

New to Fishbowl?
Download the Fishbowl app to
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.



Relatively safe assumption? Yes.
Guaranteed? No.
From what I've seen there are really two major push out points for bad associates (barring practice group slowdowns) - beginning or during their 2nd year, or around 6th-7th or so year when they have no future at the firm and they're past their profitability peak.
I've known plenty of people who weren't very liked at all (or may have been good juniors but bad once the job started getting more substantive) but made it unscathed through their midlevel years. Firms don't like firing midlevels - that's when you're at the peak of your profitability for the firm (your billing rates are high, your salary is still relatively low, and you bill a ton of hours babysitting juniors and being primary drafter, etc.). So a lot of the time, they'll just use you on "b-team" matters and put up with babysitting you a little bit more until they've milked you dry and it makes more sense to put you out to pasture.
So, short answer - I don't think you can safely assume they're respected by sole virtue of having been at one firm for a long time. But you can probably safely assume they're not as terrible as some of the people you'll see get pushed out as juniors.
It’s becoming much more common for first years to be shown the door. A lot of top firms over hired…
No, you would be surprised how long a poor associate (even one who is disliked by many) makes it in big law. I worked with a few who the partners openly complained about, but never did anything about, except lose good associates who were burned out from taking on bad associates’ workloads.
Subject Expert
The second you’re comfortable you become vulnerable. Always keep pushing. The best writer I ever met has been practicing Supreme Court appellate law for 20 years. He still reads every single merits brief in every SCOTUS case, looking for ways to improve his skills. That’s what it takes to be a high performer.
Subject Expert
A1. All good. Plenty of people don’t. 😜
No…
Subject Expert
I know people who have been here thirty years who are incompetent and hated.
Love the consensus in the response to this. My thinking too. Was wondering if it was shared.
I wouldn’t
No.