Related Posts
New to Fishbowl?
Download the Fishbowl app to
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Download the Fishbowl app to unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Copy and paste embed code on your site

Scan your QR code to download
Fishbowl app on your mobile

Mentor
You can’t have both. Be direct or don’t bother.
Is this based on instruction you're getting on how to give employees feedback so that 1. the employee receives it or 2. because your leadership disagrees? In these situations, it comes down to not having the leadership support and if you don't have it, then it's probably best to stop giving any helpful feedback. Sometimes employees have to stagnate so they can effectively choose to leave themselves or executives need to let things fester so they feel the impact of these problems themselves. Take a step back and consider whether it's really your responsibility to continue trying to fix this issue directly. You've given the feedback, if you're not supporting their continued progression that will have a natural affect.
Why do you want to be less direct?
Being indirect isn't necessarily helpful. But you can be kind and constructive while staying honest. For example, saying "this is trash" is unhelpful. But if you take time to point out what's right (recommend starting there) then directly point out where the work product can be better and what needs to be done, that's helpful. Then, see if the person needs more coaching or direction to get it done.
I’m thinking by “direct,” you’re meaning something different; otherwise, this doesn’t make much sense.