Related Posts
Who else trains legs on Monday ?
Additional Posts in Law
How competitve is a US district court clerkship?
New to Fishbowl?
Download the Fishbowl app to
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Who else trains legs on Monday ?
How competitve is a US district court clerkship?
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Download the Fishbowl app to unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Copy and paste embed code on your site

Scan your QR code to download
Fishbowl app on your mobile

As in “the Parties agree to not do X” vs. “the Parties agree not to do X”?
If so, my answer is neither - use “shall” (or “shall not”) to bind a party for present obligations and “will” (or “will not”) for future obligations.
Happy to have misunderstood.
My judge was a stickler that "not to" was grammatically correct over "to not"
It’s about breaking the infinitive - classic grammar rule that isn’t taught much anymore!
Don't split infinitives.
I use “not to.”
Neither sound like correct drafting if the goal is a covenant not to do something. “Party shall/will/may/must not” comes much closer