Related Posts
Hi friends,
Please give me likes to activate my DM.
New Pup on the way to home!

Additional Posts in Law
Me. Every single day. Since I started practicing.

Messed up a document production. What now?
H-1B Second Round Lottery for the 2022 Fiscal Year
In the upcoming fiscal year of 2022, the USCIS has made calculations on the number of H-1B visas to offer to randomly selected applicants based on acceptances, rejections, and revocations provided for previous years. The initial lottery selection for the H-1B registrants was provided for in March 2021.
https://visaserve.com/lawyer/2021/07/29/H-1B-Visa/H-1B-Second-Round-Lottery-for-the-2022-Fiscal-Year_bl42197.htm #h1b #h1bvisa #h1bfiscalyear2022 #visa #h1bregistrants #nonimmigrant #immigration #uscis #employee #employer
New to Fishbowl?
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.



How them boots taste?
How is 1L year going?
If you toss five bucks to the ACLU they'll be happy to send you a pocket-sized Constitution. You can carry it everywhere and read it all the time. Highly recommended. I have a feeling you need to get familiar with it.
Somebody had trouble in con law I see
Huh?
Retake and reapply.
Dumb.
Rising Star
Pls fix. Thx.
OP I’m going to try and be nice and assume you just don’t litigate…but courts traditionally have the power to initiate contempt cases, civil or criminal, as part of a fully constitutional exercise of their judicial authority. There is Supreme Court precedent - in fact, you can be held in contempt of a court order even if that order is found invalid, and a judge can hold you in contempt even for actions occurring outside the courtroom. This is not judicial overreach, this is literally part of their AIII powers.
AIII = Art. III => Article (“Art.” = “Article”) III (Roman numeral for the number 3). https://constitution.congress.gov/constitution/article-3/;
Federal judges must submit draft opinions on constitutional matters to the relevant Congressional committees 30 days before publication for review and comment. WOW!
If Congress fails to pass legislation responding to a national emergency within 60 days, the President may enact temporary laws by executive order, valid for one year. SOUNDS GOOD!
If the Supreme Court fails to issue a decision in a case within 7 months of oral argument, the President may issue an ‘interim constitutional interpretation’ that has binding effect until the Court rules. GRRRRREAT!
https://www.rutherford.org/publications_resources/legal_features/executive_overreach_and_the_erosion_of_constitutional_safeguards_when_the_executive_branch_becomes_judge_and_jury. Whoa!
https://www.brookings.edu/articles/is-it-the-courts-job-to-check-executive-overreach/. Yeah!
https://supreme.justia.com/cases-by-topic/separation-of-powers/. Huh!
https://www.deseret.com/politics/2025/04/01/are-federal-judges-abusing-power-over-trump-executive-orders/. What!
https://www.colorado.edu/polisci/2025/04/01/why-judiciary-no-longer-least-dangerous-branch-examining-its-expanding-power-modern. Partisan!
https://www.eurasiareview.com/06042025-executive-overreach-and-the-erosion-of-constitutional-safeguards-oped/. No!
https://supreme.justia.com/cases/federal/us/462/919/. Haha!
https://law.justia.com/cases/federal/district-courts/FSupp/731/1123/1877952/. Flag!