Related Posts
Anyone working in spain??
“Fuck it I’m going to PDF this bitch"
Anyone here 40s never married, no kids?
Does anyone know if capital G uses a headhunter
Definitely not a stress puppy.

Thoughts on Netflix’s Partner Track 😂
Pwc ke fyde in this comment thread!!
Additional Posts in Big Law
Kasowitz Benson - what is your opinion of them?
Will Feb bar exams be converted to online?
New to Fishbowl?
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.





It’s a real concern, yes. You can’t protect against everything but there are certain roles that a “probably” more insulated — IME the closer you are to the revenue the safer you are. Same goes for required regulatory positions — if you work at a PubCo the sole securities attorney is likely safe unless the company plans to just send everything to OC. Of course, there are still situations where these folks get axed, but they generally seem safer.
Then what kind of in house roles are easier to get axed?
Subject Expert
I mean, of course it’s a real concern. People who generate revenue are least likely to be laid off—regardless of the industry/business—and the inverse is certainly true. In-house legal is almost always a cost center in most companies, and that’s not going to change. But it’s a nuanced question because some businesses value legal much higher than others, so that’s the real consideration. For eg, counsel at a PE firm running a bunch of deals is in a very different position than a staff attorney doing pure contract review at a tech company. So not all in-house risk is equal and you gotta do your due diligence because certain businesses/industries have materially worse layoff history than others.
If you can get hired for one in house gig you can get hired for another. Take the severance and find something better. Never let a crisis go to waste.