Related Posts
Anyone at the Q center today/this week?
4D Friday vibes 🙏🏼

Flat refusing to look at me

Additional Posts in In-House Counsel
New to Fishbowl?
Download the Fishbowl app to
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.




In my experience it’s unlikely you’ll make a “quick advancement” and get a significant salary/title increase as a result. That’s just not how in house hiring/promotion works.
100%. If OP gets the job, they're set up for a bitter & frustrating experience on the comp front.
Conversation Starter
Can’t hurt. Worse case scenarios are they reject you for being overqualified or they give you an offer that doesn’t meet your expectations and you decline.
It depends on how overqualified. A year or two? Sure. 5 plus years? Probably not worth it unless you have some connection to the company.
Many companies have pretty strict time in service/role requirements before even being considered for advancement, or they just don’t have an opening for you to advance into so I wouldn’t count on getting a promotion quickly in house. It can also be difficult to move up several levels or “skip” levels when applying to a new company if you’re coming from a role where you are very overqualified.
I have seen companies adjust the role/title/salary band to accommodate a more experienced person, but that’s often a longer hiring process because they’ll have to go back and get approval/budget for the hire at a higher level or grade. I’ve also mostly seen it when the company wants to hire a known attorney - someone who’s already outside counsel for the company and they want to bring them in house.
This highly depends on the legal department. If it's a rather large department with defined subgroups and hierarchy, what you see is what they want. If it's a small group with just a few people, there may be some wiggle room.
We were hiring for a role and my GC is very suspect of overqualified candidates because he thinks they’ll leave the second they get a better opportunity. We ended up hiring someone more junior and downscaling the role instead. We’re a super small legal team, so can’t afford to hire someone who doesn’t seem committed for the long term.
Funny because my thought was that I’m so committed to the team/company that I am willing to take a lower salary than I think my experience dictates but I understand GCs concern… sigh!!
I've seen it happen twice -- once I was overqualified, but they were open to making it work, and then they hired someone even more overqualified than I was. Second time was internal, we posted for a role marginally more senior than mine, but for which I was qualified. Ended up hiring someone much more senior and changing the role to suit. But I've also been rejected after the screening interview when applying to more junior roles and hoping for similar results.
Chief
Unlikely