Enthusiast
Related Posts
I found so many job postings for various positions in sales at Amazon I have applied to them on LinkedIn. But Amazon never responds to any of my applications. I have 6+ yoe worked with big companies like Nestle, Reckitt and now at Allergan. I am a well seasoned Sales professional. Can someone help me out with the hiring process ?Amazon Amazon India
Hi fishes , need likes to start DM. Thank you.
Bowl Leader
Bowl Leader
What is the SHRM and is it even worth it to get?
Additional Posts in Politics
Chief
Alright, polls suck
Chief
Pro
Conversation Starter
Trump 2020!!!! 🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸🇺🇸
Dark Brandon strikes again
I’m considering this politics on the categories of education and intellectual property rights...should this be taken down? It enables laziness by giving people a way out for not doing the work. https://www.forbes.com/sites/susanadams/2021/01/28/this-12-billion-company-is-getting-rich-off-students-cheating-their-way-through-covid/
Rising Star
Do as I say, not as I do
Pro
Enthusiast
Conversation Starter
Conversation Starter
New to Fishbowl?
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Enthusiast
Kamala will win this time buddy don’t stress
Conversation Starter
What are you even talking about
Losses in the first midterm after a president has become elected are not typically related to the economy or the president’s popularity. The tendency for the president’s party to lose seats in Congress during midterm elections is one of the most consistent patterns in American politics. Political scientists often call it the “midterm penalty.”
The president’s party often loses support in Congress during midterm elections due to several psychological and behavioral factors. Supporters of the winning party tend to feel satisfied after a presidential victory, which lowers their urgency to vote, while the losing party is energized and motivated to oppose the president. Midterms also function as a referendum on the president’s performance, so voters who are dissatisfied with the administration often vote against the president’s party. Additionally, many voters instinctively prefer balanced government and may support the opposition to create a check on presidential power. Combined with lower turnout that favors highly motivated voters.
The only two exceptions in the last 100 years during a president’s first midterm (since taking office) are Franklin D. Roosevelt in 1934 and George W. Bush in 2002
Thank you the accurate mid term effect history. Everything is pointing to a repeat this year possibly amplified by Trump’s unpopularity, Iran war unpopularity and most economic indicators going in the wrong direction. Could very well be a huge blue wave taking both Senate and House.
The SAVE act is a solution to a problem that does not exist. There has been zero evidence of ppl who shouldn't be allowed to vote, voting, in any numbers larger than 2 digits. It's nonsense.
It’s just about making it harder for ppl with little spare time and driving down turnout. If we had 100% turnout Rs wouldn’t hold power again.
Conversation Starter
I know right? Imagine how much he actually must have had to win by.