Related Posts
How important is QBI for REG?
Hey, Fishies! We’re launching our first Interview/Q+A series "Portfolio Rewind: Would You Hire You?"
Like a portfolio review in reverse, creative leaders will share work they created when they first started out and critique it as if were a book that had just landed in their inbox. Then, tell us if they’d hire their younger selves knowing, and expecting, what they do now.
Drop in for get the chance to ask questions, and get your book reviewed by our guest. Hope you can make it!
zoom.us/j/92635977143
Additional Posts in Law
Any family lawyers here?
New to Fishbowl?
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.




Rising Star
Both sound great!
lol
I agree that both sound great. Does it matter how long the person with 35 years plans to work?
If you’re hiring them into your firm I would probably initially be drawn to the one with 35 years experience - because they’ll be more likely to have experienced the way I or my firm prefer to do things or programs we use. The one who worked one firm will be more likely to be surprised by things that differ from her one firm she’s worked at. But both good. And type of law is iffy: experience only in transactional may make me less inclined to hire them into lit for example. But employment vs commercial lit I wouldn’t have a big preference.
10 years- so long as it’s the same type that I practice.