Related Posts
Anyone gone from PA to CBRE ? Do you like it ?
More Posts
Additional Posts in Federal Government Lawyers
New to Fishbowl?
Download the Fishbowl app to
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Anyone gone from PA to CBRE ? Do you like it ?
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Download the Fishbowl app to unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Copy and paste embed code on your site

Scan your QR code to download
Fishbowl app on your mobile

I went DOJ Main to in house to an investigations role at a tech company. Depending on the work you can definitely go back. But once you are over here the money and WLB will make it hard to go back.
I think it’s possible in light of your AUSA experience. But you won’t be litigating in-house for what seems like 3-5 years and I think that may hurt your candidacy. Why not go to a law firm instead and then back to Fed?
Truthfully, I’m thinking about going in-house because I have young kids and want to make more money. Big law solves the money problem but it also means I won’t be around to watch my kids grow up.
I'm interested in this path as well. Do you mind sharing how the in-house investigations offer came about? I'm an AUSA with about 3 years experience (former biglaw for a few years) in a medium sized district with a heavy white collar caseload.
I just applied on LinkedIn tbh. I’m in a district with a strong tech presence, that may be a factor…. but I don’t have any view behind the curtain otherwise. Resume-wise,I’m fairly similar to you (3ish years in WC).
I’ve seen someone go AUSA to in house but not then back to fed.
Yeah AUSA to in house seems to be fairly doable, just not sure about the other direction.
I did this. I was a white collar associate at a boutique litigation firm for 5 years, went in house as compliance counsel for a bit, then ended up at one of the agencies you named.
Just over a year. And I'd note my fed role isn't in enforcement but a specialized group in OGC.
If you are in a non-litigating role for 3-5 years, it will be a bit more difficult to go back to a fed gov 1st chair litigation role. Certainly not impossible for a former AUSA. Though they might wonder why you only stayed 3 years in that role.
There are plenty of fed gov lawyer positions that do not involve 1st chair litigating responsibility, and I think many of those would be readily attainable for an in-house counsel with prior fed gov experience.