Related Posts
Additional Posts in Law
New to Fishbowl?
Download the Fishbowl app to
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Download the Fishbowl app to unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Copy and paste embed code on your site

Scan your QR code to download
Fishbowl app on your mobile

You are being efficient but still need to be “paid” for that efficiency. So if it usually takes 4 hours and took you 2 hours because you are efficient, bill 4 hours.
If your billing system isn’t set up for flat fee charges then you aren’t billing clients the full fee when you are too efficient.
go in house where ur efficiency will be rewRded with more free tome
True story!
finish work too quickly doesn’t mean you should bill less… if normally it takes 8 hours and you use 6, bill 8 and use the 2 hour to review.
It has to be human billable hours. We aren’t ChatGPT billing only seconds where our bodies are actively crushing the work. Humans need time to think about the problem, review the rules, draft the work product, and review it. If you bill half the time expected for a project and there is a mistake, you are going to have a hard time arguing you didn’t rush and make a careless mistake. Also, there is so much fee pressure in bigger law so you probably also have countless hours working that you can’t bill for. To survive a career in this industry, you need to make work product impeccable and bills consistent and reliable so clients trust what they will get on all fronts.
Do your seniors think your work product is good? Sometimes juniors finish work quickly but it could have used review and consideration.
For the most part, yeah
Yep. Take breaks and keep the timer running. Review, etc. You will burn out if you do everything at lightning speed without breaks. This is why I left patent prosecution. The budgets there do not give you break/review time.
I'm a paralegal, but, obviously, I get projects/requests outside of my regular tasks.
Usually, these things took less time than the attorney expected.
Often I would not just immediately respond with the results. I would set it aside, do something else, and go back for a review. Fresh eyes.
Review is SO important.
I'm not slacking or trying to waste time. But I want my information to be correct. If I mess up and my attorney presents bad information, I don't want that on me. And I want my attorney to succeed.
So finish the task, do something else, and go back to it.
Exactly. While a task may not take as much time as expected by the attorney, paralegals may know their way around the programs/systems etc to get a quick answer. Personally I do IP, and my attorneys, while they had access to the docket programs, never knew how to get reports, find the status of an application, check foreign PTOs for info, etc. And that wasn't their job. It was my job to do that.
I always reviewed, of course. But I didn't want to set unrealistic expectations as well.
Yes, I may do something quickly, it is harder when I'm expected to rush to get an answer and me knowing I didn't review completely
You should look at using a timer, and make sure you’re billing for everything you can - emails, phone calls, research, review, etc.
These are all just made up rules and just another reason why the judging associates by billing is a terribly dumb metric because people will spend different time on things with little insight into how the billing partner will view that and people just make up their own rules
A second adding review time!
Don’t bill that!
For the record, I’m not a junior. I’m a mid level
Your problem is that you’re being ethical. If Senior says it should take you 4 hours, bill 4-5 hours. You don’t necessarily need to actually be doing work during those 4-5 hours. I used to be like you… I’d bill less, so I got shit for my low hours. I started over billing and suddenly became a “superstar.”
Work the two it takes you to do it and then pace around the next two hours “thinking” ? Idk. Thats a joke answer. But this is an interesting problem and I wanted to follow it.