Related Posts
Recruiting Firms in SF? Or agencies hiring?
Anyone works at Goodwin? I’ve been interested and applying in the last few weeks, so far, I am intrigued. I’m currently in the LA area, I’m planning to stay but I’m open to relocating either SF or Boston as well. If any can connect to their Recuritment or Talent Acquisition Team or any references, information or connections! Let me know!
Additional Posts in Patent Prosecution
Which IP firm has best in-house exit options?
New to Fishbowl?
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Haven't looked it up, but I would think an admission wouldn't be an issue for an actual bar here. i.e., it might be an admission if you fail to argue that something is non analogous art, but if something is objectively not prior art, an admission wouldn't make a difference.
My first step would be to call the Examiner, tell him that this isn't prior art for the following reason, what do you want in my affidavit? Wouldn't even mention the previous arguments.
Downside is that there are already unnecessary arguments in the record that narrow your claims.
FYI, my answer for issues like this is almost always call the Examiner. They usually won't know the answer, but it doesn't matter because you get to write in your response that "as discussed in the Examiner Interview of XXX, we are submitting herewith . . ."
As long as prosecution is still open, you can argue that a reference is not prior art and provide the affidavit. Of course, this should always be been done in the first place to avoid having to put any arguments on the record that can be used against the patent owner in litigation.