Related Posts
If Tech Mahindra HR is telling that after joining he will take care of onsite. It is US project. So in U4 Tech Lead position is it possible to send someone US onsite in L1/business Visa?? Shall I consider the onsite opportunity what HR is telling?? Or I should consider other companies to join. Please suggest I am really confused. Accenture Tech Mahindra Tata Consultancy Infosys Wipro
How's JPMC account in Cognizant?
Growth and wlb.
Additional Posts in Big Law
Kleinberg Kaplan thoughts anyone?
What are the top litigation practices in LA?
New to Fishbowl?
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.





Why would it be career suicide?
Subject Expert
At worst, a secondment might signal an openness to going in house at some point down the line. In the best case, it’s usually framed as a way to better understand the client’s business, deepen the relationship, and ultimately service that client more effectively from inside the firm (which is why I said these things are generally viewed favorably in any event). A secondment by itself, in the absence of other strong signals that OP is clearly headed in house, doesn’t meaningfully take counsel/NEP off the table, and for sure doesn’t warrant all the “career suicide” catastophizing.
A few views as someone who just did one:
1) if you ever want to try it out, the time is now - not when you’re senior
2) depends on how long the secondment is. 3 months is a blip on the radar, 6 months is standard, anything longer is significantly disruptive.
3) it’s disruptive either way. I think this depends on your firm, but be prepared for slower months coming back. Matters less as a mid level, and prob easier bc every firm needs mid levels.
4) it is excellent experience and will help you get an in house job if your strategy is to stay/gun for partner and if you don’t make it, go in house (the time to go in house is as a mid level, and as a senior you will have more obstacles, namely other candidates with prior in house experience - this helps hedge against that)
I think secondments are generally given/done by two kinds:
1. Just to show you the other side a bit. 6 month period, good for your development, and might also be a nice breather. Everyone wins.
2. To try and get rid of you. You might be able to turn it into an actual offer. Everybody wins: the client gets an employee, the associate a new job, and the firm a client with a counsel they have a relationship with. Of course, this becomes more problematic if you don’t get an offer/misdiagnose and don’t see it as a way out.
I literally had a partner once who desperately wanted to get rid of an associate but didn’t want to fire him because he liked him. Gave him two secondments, but the clients didn’t want him.