Related Posts
Anyone in DFW want to do something?
More Posts
Hi fishers! I have offer and signed contract with Deloitte UK and my start day is in the beginning of April. I need skilled worker visa, and we haven’t applied yet for that. Screening and onboarding is in progress. Immigration team doesn’t reply since reached me out 1st time. How much time does it usually needed to go through the whole process? How many days take for visa to be approved since application?Deloitte
does anyone here work for Veeva Crossix?
Additional Posts in Luxury Watches
Omega in Tulum

Opinions on this brand?

New to Fishbowl?
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.










Chief
The Rolex bubble will lift, or sink, the value of both pretty much equally. It’s highly unlikely one would perform differently than the other. There’s absolutely no fundamental reason that they would.
Rising Star
The difference in value between both will be very minimal. I’d pick the one you like more.
16570 is a hell of a watch. I wouldnt buy a watch with thoughts of selling it though. Buy it to enjoy it.
Visual Storyteller
Yup buying to enjoy. Don’t really think of watches as investments, but if they can retain their value over the long term then it’s an added benefit
Chief
Agree I think the difference would be really minimal. If I were to get another Rolex it would be one of these two references
Both popular models, I think your money if safe in either. My pick would be the polar would I don't have the wrists for the sea dweller.
Rising Star
I would think the explorer would barring anything weird happening like Rolex discontinuing that reference. The explorer is a smaller and hence easier watch to wear. I think the sea dwellers size could steer people away
Rising Star
Interesting. I have a sub. Didn’t go for the sea dweller cuz I didn’t like the thicknes
Def Polar Ex II. Sea Dweller is more niche and not as popular due to its weight. Also, Sea Dweller is going to be more expensive when you get it serviced. Just had my 16570 serviced and it was over $1K.