Related Posts
Hey guys, I need 11 likes. Thank you.
Additional Posts in Entertainment
New to Fishbowl?
Download the Fishbowl app to
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Hey guys, I need 11 likes. Thank you.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Download the Fishbowl app to unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Copy and paste embed code on your site

Scan your QR code to download
Fishbowl app on your mobile

If it's outside the producer's guild, scenarios like that can get pretty complicated and messy. There are rules the guild established and those provide a pretty good guideline, and even people involved in indie projects would be smart to follow them. Of course, it's a business where ego always outranks what is smart.
I hate the politics of what we do. That being said I think the person who does the most work should get the credit honestly.
You can easily include a lot of people in the credits. It becomes an ego contest as to who gets first in line. I work behind the scenes, so I don’t have as much stake in it.
That sounds very chaotic! I think the most work definitely but unfortunately due to company politics it never works out that way.
I personally think all of the ego politics when it comes to credits are silly. And credits are cheap, so does it really matter that much?
Sounds like they all three are Producers. Unless none of the third's connections contributed anything at all. Then they are just bragging about connections and shouldn't be a producer at all. But the one who obtained the funds and the one who got all logistics for the movie sounds like they are the producers. If the one had who had connections, did any of the connections do anything for the film, did they get their connections involved??
Who did the most work I believe. So hard when politics are involved though.