Related Posts
What happened at Heat?
Say it louder for the ignorant people in the back.

Additional Posts in Patent Prosecution
New to Fishbowl?
Download the Fishbowl app to
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
What happened at Heat?
Say it louder for the ignorant people in the back.

This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Download the Fishbowl app to unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Copy and paste embed code on your site

Scan your QR code to download
Fishbowl app on your mobile

You can't compare them like that. Billing lit is much easier though, you can get lost in discovery. Even when doing nornal writing the problem with pros is that it is so flat fee/commoditized that it has extreme efficiency goals. In lit you can be more relaxed and take the time it needs to make something perfect. Lit is also less mentally tiring because there are a lot of tasks you can zone out/half pay attention to. Pros actually used to have a lower hour req than anything else industry wide because of how hard it is to bill in pros but that isn't the case at most firms anymore because profitablity makes it hard to cut hours reqs nowadays.
Patent prosecution at a law firm makes no sense anymore.
I feel like patent pros only firms need to resort to tricks to make it profitable. Like my last firm was "overly cautious" with duty of disclosure and decided to cross-cite a bunch of families. There were a few sets where if an office action came in for one, we'd file an IDS citing the 892 in about dozen (sometimes more, and in one case 50+) cases. That's a lot in IDS fees/bills, and it's minimal review by the attorney because each IDS form is identical.
At my current firm they have junior attorneys draft the most routine reporting letters thinking a client won't argue with a 0.1, 0.2, 0.3, etc... it sucks.