So. Is anyone telling our clients that if they want AI art and headlines in their ad campaigns, they don’t actually get to own those AI-created assets, or are we just glossing over that?
Related Posts
Guys did you hear the big news???
Hi All, Today I've resigned and my LOD is 2 Sept. Can anyone please let me know for these 90 days salary would be credited only after FnF. Or June'22 salary will be credited as usual, however, July and September salary would be credited during FnF. Please confirm or suggest.
Regards,
HCL Technologies
Additional Posts in Advertising
Just realized it's not Friday ☹️
Wendys twitter interactions are pure gold.
Best work of 2019 so far?
New to Fishbowl?
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.



Chief
Just reading the ruling, is it saying that someone else owns the copyright? Or that generally nobody can own the copyright?
If the latter then it’s different from them using a Getty image without paying for it, for example. It’s sort of… public domain-ish?
I think Midjourney’s “licensing” policy basically says you own it… but it’s your responsibility to defend that.
Art autonomously created by AI cannot be copyrighted was the ruling in the U.S.
Rising Star
When you use Adobe or Shutterstock, you actually have rights negotiated within the licensing agreement
Rising Star
Well clients seem ok with it. I assume that by the time they get a cease-and-desist letter from somebody the spot or piece of work will have run its course anyway.