Related Posts
Any news from DPW? 🤔🤔
Anyone here tryna go into impact investing?
Additional Posts in In-House Counsel
New to Fishbowl?
Download the Fishbowl app to
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Any news from DPW? 🤔🤔
Anyone here tryna go into impact investing?
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Download the Fishbowl app to unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Copy and paste embed code on your site

Scan your QR code to download
Fishbowl app on your mobile

These days, it depends on your practice area, how many years of practice you have, and in which company you’re trying to go in-house. For example, Bigtech is an uphill battle if you aren’t ex-biglaw.
Nah, I’ve been in big tech and we had plenty of legal counsel and legal directors who started out in contract management/contract negotiation(myself included) or compliance. Now, if you want to be senior leadership (ie Deputy General Counsel, Division Counsel, GC etc. they might be more of an insistence on big law.
I got lucky bc of my work experience but yes, most of the hires are former BigLaw.
No. Never worked a day in big law and have been in-house for over a decade.
Nope. I had a compliance stamp. Then in house. Now I’m leaving in house to go to big law.
Former prosecutor here. Mid-size law buddy passed on a recruiter’s offer and referred me. It really comes down to your network and establishing a rapport at the interview.
Not in my case. I have never worked in a law firm and have been in house since the day I passed the bar (actually for a year before when I was interning while in law school).
Same (but two years interning there)
100% NO.
I worked in a very small firm (4 attorneys) for a year before I landed my first in house gig. The proof is in the pudding (your work ethic), not where you come from. Remember that.
Nope
Rising Star
Never went big law and I’m at a F15.
Rising Star
I was recently promoted so I’d say no. Advancement is generally constrained in-house while you wait for people ahead of you to leave so you can move up but it hasn’t been an issue for me so far.
Nope. I've been in house straight out of law school for a few years already. I'm also hiring and care very little about big law experience for applicants
In-house is not necessarily the escape from law firm crappiness it is assumed to be. You're basically trading in working for many clients to working for one. Better screen the hell out of that one and get a sense of what you are signing up for before making the leap.
Nope. Fourth tier law grad and now sr counsel for a leading manufacturing company. All my in house bosses didn’t care where I went to school or if I had big law experience. I’d argue big law probably doesn’t help for an in house generalist as you’ve likely had a lot of specialization. 
Chief
Corporate and securities, likely yes. Commercial or privacy, no.
Absolutely not. Relevant, high quality experience is the most important.
Definitely not
Pro
Nope. Similar to D1, I never worked in BigLaw and am working in-house at F300 over a decade too.
Of course not. There’s all kinds of companies. Some really want those biglaw credentials, and some really don’t care. Are you going to become the GC of Citibank if you never worked in biglaw? Probably not. Can you become the GC of some small company that pays 100-200k? Sure.
And of course there’s exceptions, not uncommon for ex-biglaw folks to take in-house jobs that pay less than first year biglaw, and non-biglaw folks occasionally get hired at bigger companies that pay quite well.
Not at all.
Absolutely not. If the manager has experience in big law, they will likely push for it hiring meeting, and, as unfortunate as that may sound, the manager generally doesn’t have experience in big law so it’s not as much of an issue as it may appear to be.
Nope. My role opened to me because of personal relationships I’ve built in my network, and the years I spent focused on my industry at a mid-sized firm.