Related Posts
How can I change the project in Accenture?
Anyone know the salary for a vp at Marcus?
How do you handle revisions at a company?
Additional Posts in Accounting
Ladies, are gifts important to you?
Made it through another day of the Hunger Games!
New to Fishbowl?
Download the Fishbowl app to
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
At this point, each candidate has enough demonstrate history that have observed the behavior, words, and policies of both major candidates and their parties.
I find that Trump is not someone that I can relate to meson a social behavioral standpoint. His words I find are unnecessarily strident and vague about the details of how his presidency can/will move America forward. His economic, immigration, national security, world presence, and social policies have proven to be consistent, constructive, and effective.
I find Kamala Harris to be equally unrelatable, but for a very different reason: her presence reflects a person who does not have a True North, a real foundation. She strikes me as someone who is continuously sniffing the air for which breeze to follow for her own advantage. Her words have a deliberate vagueness so she always has the wiggle room to make her words take on whatever contrived message is convenient in the moment. Kamala’s economic, immigration, national security, world presence, and social ideas reflect a sense of desperation du jour.
Excellent observation! I find that regular people are actually more pragmatic and realistic in their views than media. Hence I do ask people I respect their opinion as I always can learn something.
While Politico is left center it is rated high for being factual.
It's more like Fox is far right and everyone else is normal society.
It’s not really like that at all
What the heck does this got to do with accounting?!
Try international news channels. They’re far more reaching in terms of the issues they cover and are way less biased compared to many if not all media houses.
Breaking Points with Saagar and Krystal.
Ground News - it is subscription based for articles and pulls them into one place and then provides you information regarding the ownership of the publication which way the bias leans and how much it is being discussed (right, center, left and the percentage). It shows you the different ways headlines are written based on the bias as well. There is also a blind spot section so if you do tend to get your information from one side that you see what the other side is talking about but that isn’t being covered at all (or minimally) on the side you view.
There is no "unbiased news". About anything. (Well, not anymore.)(
Finding an unbiased news source requires one to be unbiased. It takes a lens. Consume numerous sources and then seek differentiation.