How legit are chambers rankings for partners?
Related Posts
How many employees does KGS have in total?
What's your controversial Houston opinion?
Additional Posts in Big Law
Anyone taken a 3week vacation before?
Kasowitz Benson - what is your opinion of them?
New to Fishbowl?
Download the Fishbowl app to
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.



It's legit as it can be because it's based on deals the attorney is leading and the references they provide to backup their experiences and reputation.
Keep in mind that you could be a superstar attorney, but if you're not well received at your firm, they're not going to put you down for a chambers nomination.
Coach
Yes. Google chambers submissions process. You need upwards of 20 high quality references to give you glowing reviews. Many top firms have a team that puts many hours into the submissions.
Subject Expert
Pretty legit. I think the only issue is that it has a lot of inertia, so once you're on it's hard to get knocked off, even if you really ain't doing much practice-wise and are coasting off your rep.
Chambers and Legal 500 are the closest you’ll get to legitimate rankings of attorneys.
As far as I can tell, Chambers is the only prestige marker that people actually respect.
I’m a chambers ranked partner for 5 years so take this with a grain of salt but here is my experience. In my practice area, it’s recognized as a good benchmark for who is a leader in our space. I was nominated originally by my firm but had great client reviews (a handful at the time - definitely not 20) and then other people - generally partners - at other firms spoke highly of me in their reviews. Getting ranked is IMO a good goal to have professionally; it’s nice to be recognized for your contributions in the area in which you practice and your skills. Happy to answer any questions.
Thank you so much, super helpful!
Do these superstars usually hold Managing partner title? I was surprised none of the partners in my office are ranked.
No. They just have to have a lot of experience and recognition as well as clients who will go to bat for them. Chambers mostly gets it right in major practice areas while niche areas can be gamed a bit more. Maybe your firm doesn’t make submissions or makes poor submissions (a firm I worked at had an absurd process for lining up sterling references and preparing submissions).
Chambers historically has trailed reality (keeping semi-retired folks at the top of rankings and being slow to add breakout stars) but they’re trying to correct for that a bit now when they interview people in the relevant field.