Related Posts
Additional Posts in Big Law
New to Fishbowl?
Download the Fishbowl app to
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Download the Fishbowl app to unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Copy and paste embed code on your site

Scan your QR code to download
Fishbowl app on your mobile

Mentor
In my personal and unbiased opinion, yes.
Do you ever think there’s more to life than being really really ridiculously good looking (producing drafts)?
At a lot of firms, counsel are technicians - their job is to act as super-senior associates. Partners have BD and other, non-substantive things to address. That's why they have associates and keep good ones around as counsel.
Subject Expert
Right, one thing its easy to miss is how little partners draft - to the point of often very earnest excitement when on occasion they get to. It just doesn't make sense from a time / cost perspective. The cruelty of most jobs is you get good at stuff and then can't spend time on it anymore haha
Mentor
Partners provide clients
Mentor
There ain't gonna be any drafts to perfect without the partners generating that business tho. 🤑💸
Mentor
such an innocent question 🥲
Enthusiast
But if the partners are so bad at substantive skills, how do they get clients?
Subject Expert
In most cases the partners have no clients of their own. That’s the dirty little secret of biglaw. And OP’s original point is why I direct most of my work to counsel or associates at some of my outside firms, rather than to the “relationship” partner.
Partners aren’t still aiming to make partner.
(Assuming not NEPs, who tend to have fewer typos than EPS).
The best post ever written.
At our firm, counsels are particularly terrible. But I think that’s unique to my firm.