Related Posts
Hi everyone, I am 4.9 years experienced , I joined Fractal 3 months ago as a data engineer, but still haven't got any project. Process is so slow that I have received only 4 to 5 project calls. I switched in hopes that will learn the new tech and tools. But now i am starting to forget even the one i knew. Should i go for change or wait a little more time as fractal is reputed in AI/ML? I have interview lined up with Impetus as for now. Would it be better choice?
More Posts
Amazon Web Services Hi Fishes! I'm a fresher with 10 months exp currently working in Oracle as a cloud analyst. I'm not really enjoying my work here in OCI, and have been exploring and learning about AWS lately. Looking for opportunities to switch to AWS. Am I going in the right direction? Can anyone pls provide any valuable suggestions/resources/contacts? Thanks!!Amazon Web Services Amazon Oracle IBM Consulting
Let's go 🤗

Additional Posts in Privacy Law
Anyone else dying this week 😅
Anyone take the CIPM recently? How was it?
New to Fishbowl?
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.



Umm, lots of companies give data subject rights to everyone. But yeah, Chat GPT is not good for drafting much of anything legal.
Ah. Well that’s just stupid then.
Lol. This can’t be real. Did this really happen? Hahaha. Wowzer!!
Can confirm I’ve had a client send me a privacy policy drafted by ChatGPT that they asked me to “review.” It was pretty much as you’d expect (and in line with OP’s experience).
Lmfaooooooo
Sounds like a new opportunity to go after businesses with sh*t policies written by chatgpt
Never tried ChatGPT for drafting policies, but I was under the impression that it could produce a decent first draft to work off. I guess I was wrong. My organization is considering the use of genAI for internal policies, like employee handbook, trainings, specific HR policies and guidance.
I appreciate their initiative to use trendy tech but it would have been much easier to just poach a privacy policy from a similar company
My view after fooling around with ChatGPT is that the quality is equivalent to that of a first year associate. Can produce an OK starting point that looks good, but by no means a finished product. And it will lack any flags/commentary/questions an actual inexperienced lawyer might put in the document. A non lawyer would be foolish to rely on its output.
It could be worse. https://www.reuters.com/legal/new-york-lawyers-sanctioned-using-fake-chatgpt-cases-legal-brief-2023-06-22/