Related Posts
Does McCann have a bowl??
Additional Posts in Big Law
White collar folks - how busy are you guys now?
New to Fishbowl?
Download the Fishbowl app to
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Does McCann have a bowl??
White collar folks - how busy are you guys now?
This site is protected by reCAPTCHA and the Google Privacy Policy and Terms of Service apply.
Download the Fishbowl app to unlock all discussions on Fishbowl.
Copy and paste embed code on your site

Scan your QR code to download
Fishbowl app on your mobile

all things are possible, but that sounds very hard
Coach
Not really, no. Especially if you’re doing it from scratch.
This is kind of insane.
While possible, this does sound extremely difficult given the number of documents to review. Is there at least someone that can spend a few hours with you walking through the material facts so you can get a grasp on what is going on and have a better sense of what documents you need to be focused on?
Not if you want it to have a real chance.
Enthusiast
Terrible management in my opinion. And kinda irresponsible to pawn off such an important task to someone who’s never worked on the case less than one week before the deadline. But now that you’re stuck with it, just do your best. If it gets ultimately denied or isn’t in the best shape possible, it’s not on you. You did your part.
You also should consider reaching out for additional associate help (even for discrete tasks like research or reviewing transcripts), as that will shave off some time to make your life easier this next week.
It depends on what the issues are. The expert reports should help guide you on what important documents to review are.
Insane. Use Harvey if your firm has it for dep cites, expert reports, and key docs!
I’ve done this but only when the actual handling attorneys hand fed me the location of evidence (ie who said what in depo, what the pertinent documents are, etc.)
Subject Expert
You kinda have to use AI at this point. You just need to review the output carefully. And break up the assignment so you’re not dumping a massive set of docs into Harvey or whatever all at once. You have to be mindful of context windows and the fact that these tools can start losing the thread and massively hallucinating if you overload them.
Since when is anything/anyone related to this job reaaonable?reasonable?
That said, I think it is manageable if you're patent lit and they generally identified which arguments you are making. You are limited to the scope of the expert report mostly anyway so you probably just need to reiterate what is their but write it better rather than reinvent the wheel
No. Ask the court for an extension.